Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-mesos-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-mesos-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3BFD10633 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41772 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 22:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-mesos-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41742 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 22:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mesos-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41734 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2013 22:26:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vinod@twitter.com designates 209.85.192.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.172] (HELO mail-pd0-f172.google.com) (209.85.192.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:26:07 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t10so2474399pdi.3 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=twitter.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=gIYnqqOOMdQbm5xfeGdsQ/IIPp1w5xtrDAlODLd5DLw=; b=ESEBZaCroWKExLkv+GeZn/dh/2NcWd+2pFl1/xSZPIIvDoAbtxwv9+4f6B1we2dRF1 1ZYP3uVXQ0lsh+CzYzkjQSFgvz0jyCLxHW8Egv8gnTDNGBoy+TmQN6z47jRzykHstxgD Vwlu06VskUc0SjQVKabCcTenRRfzR/u771S78= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=gIYnqqOOMdQbm5xfeGdsQ/IIPp1w5xtrDAlODLd5DLw=; b=BEByFzqGJW5RXMW/gSVHZ4dmxzkaGmZpMupYuf61ry/nzuPws07lSLu0yEO2XrX18E AlemGx/lcDJ4XKjukF8NgKrn/JdDfpIqPcOHVns8pXR7zp+4s+BJfEGILoGey/+dNQWu XwYKi1AaocJCYo0gByqBYp+OYDvc1Lf/XncPLSRO1eQYfYZyKeTZDANFsaxKAQZVyxdI IztT+ofFemTu9LFKBJ6hgpdbGNJN1r4wQWosFSbC21TVCKtlIM7v70d7vfgk1Wvt4d4J SVWA0Yybs2tNvN1dax43U8ztOXq5nzwhZN4xIXHZ5wyiY9rtUUwU/sJ0jPhW6LkxDfWN e/1g== X-Received: by 10.68.194.135 with SMTP id hw7mr35342939pbc.192.1370471147275; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:25:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.105.227 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:25:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Vinod Kone Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:25:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ticket Versions To: "mesos-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10cf11e89a2a04de6fad12 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXHN3k0/iXNF3xQKrLUkg4O2C8a+kKuXqLkAWEwtZ+JyuXf5i5Q/RXWsMJ81G1CAbIBFHY X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b10cf11e89a2a04de6fad12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Affects version 'None' sgtm. @vinodkone On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Benjamin Mahler wrote: > What do people think for marking up tickets like the following: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-340 > > The bug existed on trunk between 0.11.0 and 0.12.0. That is, the bug does > not exist in 0.11.0, nor 0.12.0. Rather it only existed on trunk in the > interim. > > Marking a Fix Version of '0.12.0' with Affects Version 'None' makes sense, > but might be misleading? Thoughts? > --047d7b10cf11e89a2a04de6fad12--