Mailing-List: contact lucy-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucy-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gorankent@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFAN8vzN1TeCEWsmhuGqK64xgo+voHuvbcwW=gCUggcAbXnc9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKn6EF-0Btji3ytbqGhgmapcyO2dtPzPU1BS9ihk002K585B_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFAN8vzN1TeCEWsmhuGqK64xgo+voHuvbcwW=gCUggcAbXnc9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:28:54 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAKn6EF9LtPp1XV14rnjUGEp7OYZL3fwevdmw-Nd4yzed4xqrHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: goran kent <gorankent@gmail.com>
To: lucy-user@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [lucy-user] Identifying relevant field in $hits

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Nathan Kurz <nate@verse.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:06 AM, goran kent <gorankent@gmail.com> wrote
>> My minor problem is: =A0I have inbound link text pointing to a page
>> which is indexed along with the page content itself. =A0Since it's never
>> displayed, you might have a hit on this 'hidden' text (but highly
>> relevant in my case) and no other hits, so the excerpt is void of any
>> highlighting (I can just hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from
>> my future users). =A0It would be nice to be able to flag this kind of
>> search result as "Found your term in inbound text" or whatever).
>
> I can't tell if you are tongue in cheek about this or not. =A0I agree
> with you, it will cause wailing and gnashing, but it's also been
> Google's default behavior for a long time. =A0Search for:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=3D"links+pointing+to+this+page" for a
> litany of people complaining about just this.

lol Thanks for that.  It's nice when my experience of End Users and
their sometimes unreasonable expectations is confirmed.