Mailing-List: contact lucy-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of loganbell@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F16D6AA.6040209@peknet.com>
References: <4F139AEE.9020201@peknet.com>
	<20120116230602.GA18668@rectangular.com>
	<4F16AC1F.2080908@aevum.de>
	<4F16D6AA.6040209@peknet.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:33:40 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAHkJ3Cto1A3y2D0FT9X9zLvDdTbVPos2tvcwSwzHtKdmFzB10Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Logan Bell <loganbell@gmail.com>
To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org, peter@peknet.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.3.0 RC 1

+1

All tests successful.
Files=3D176, Tests=3D12431, 17 wallclock secs ( 1.49 usr  0.52 sys + 11.77
cusr  1.71 csys =3D 15.49 CPU)
Result: PASS

OS X 10.6.8 Perl 5.14.0

Thanks,
Logan


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Peter Karman <peter@peknet.com> wrote:
> On 1/18/12 5:25 AM, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
>
>> The attached patch addresses some of these points. In the auto generated
>> changes list the new features are buried below bugfixes and
>> improvements. I think they should go up front.
>
>
> Thanks for the patch, Nick.
>
> We still need you to issue a VOTE on the RC. If you think the patch shoul=
d
> be applied for the 0.3.0 release, then you probably want to vote -1 and t=
hen
> we can re-roll a RC 2 with the patch.
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Karman =A0. =A0http://peknet.com/ =A0. =A0peter@peknet.com