Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5463363EE for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51783 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 16:07:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51753 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 16:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucy-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51744 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 16:07:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:07:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.116.39.62] (HELO rectangular.com) (68.116.39.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:07:47 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QR4rw-0002pz-Gi for lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 08:59:04 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:59:04 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <20110530155904.GA10873@rectangular.com> References: <20110529061633.A836123888EA@eris.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110529061633.A836123888EA@eris.apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] "one down" On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 06:16:33AM -0000, joes@apache.org wrote: > Log: > one down > - * Tests for charmonizer need to become independent executables. Nice work, Joe! The new design is conceptually much more sensible in comparison to the previous scheme of compiling Charmonizer's tests into the main Lucy XS shared object and invoking them via an XS handle buried in trunk/perl/lib/Lucy/Test.pm. ... I'd also like to mark "one down" regarding Lucy's incubation progress. Both Peter and Joe have now done significant hacking on the the Charmonizer code base, and Nate helped with the high level design of Charmonizer, including the QUOTE macro and the file layout. There are still files that only I have touched and there is still knowledge to be dispersed regarding the materials in charmonizer/src/Charmonizer/Core, but I think it's fair to say that with regards to maintaining and improving Lucy's Charmonizer layer, there is no longer any one committer who is indispensible. Marvin Humphrey