Mailing-List: contact libcloud-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: libcloud@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of grig.gheorghiu@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=SThGfzwSPxjFBWgzY1lXKI7piLx2Mv/a6nL8digomoTRr+NEZqAY5+1gf0NrGkJL8I
         Kd1SXRCGw14cMwfBznCY7grnV4DgqVh+C3M4VQ51BD+fMHd5A8D06xf/MGinwrHUAb3g
         nnjrGDAsbLQAdsnzaM5aIH8ZqczdTIV+v+O5I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2C11D37E-5C42-46F9-B774-7DB5149C6134@dislocatedday.com>
References: <20110404221031.GA26577@reemsky>
	<BANLkTi=iw8R6Re_KmNMZbJrfJoE5_PB6pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110406192747.GA1403@reemsky>
	<18D6D9CB-76AC-4DF8-890E-1B6B8C63BC15@gandi.net>
	<20110413042927.GA21320@reemsky>
	<2C11D37E-5C42-46F9-B774-7DB5149C6134@dislocatedday.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:25:19 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTikz1BxmpChUsxS0ixUBth5ydHwwVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Grig Gheorghiu <grig.gheorghiu@gmail.com>
To: libcloud@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Tom Davis <tom@dislocatedday.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [libcloud] Load Balancers support

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Tom Davis <tom@dislocatedday.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Updates on load balancing support. What do I have now:
>>
>> * Functional GoGrid and Rackspace drivers
>> * Unit-tests for basic features
>>
>> Code is on github (as I mentioned before):
>>
>> https://github.com/novel/libcloud/compare/balancers
>>
>> It needs some more love for sure, but generally it's ready to hit main
>> repository, in my opinion.
>>
>> The only concern I have there is when we are going to ship 0.5.0? If
>> we're going to ship it really soonish, I'd rather wait for it to ship
>> and commit balancers stuff thereafter.
>>
>> I think I will need about 2 or maybe 3 weeks to polish and test the
>> code.
>>
>> Also, Paul had some concerns about 'lb' not being top-level module
>> (libcloud.resource.lb as opposed to libcloud.lb). Any more thoughts on
>> that?
>
> I agree with Paul=97something that only supports a couple providers proba=
bly shouldn't be a top-level module. Also, I don't understand why it's call=
ed "lb"; it's completely non-descriptive and not even a common acronym.

LB is actually a very common acronym in systems administration.

Grig