incubator-kato-spec mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sonal Goyal <sonalgoy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Conference Call
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:04:06 GMT
Hi,
Are we on?

I get a :
Please Stand By ...
[image: Waiting to Join Conference]
The moderator has not yet arrived. Please stand by.
You will automatically join the conference as soon as it becomes available.
If you believe this conference has already started, please confirm the
conference ID and start time.


Thanks and Regards,
Sonal


On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Stuart Monteith <stukato@stoo.me.uk> wrote:

> Hello,
>   That is confirmed - 1500-1600 UTC.
>
> Regards,
>   Stuart
>
>
> Bobrovsky, Konstantin S wrote:
>
>> Hi Stuart,
>>
>> Please confirm that the conference will be at 1500-1600 *UTC* (equal to
>> Greenwich Mean Time) today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Konst
>>  Intel Novosibirsk
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park, 17 Krylatskaya
>> Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614, Russian Federation
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stuart Monteith [mailto:stukato@stoo.me.uk] Sent: Wednesday, April
>> 22, 2009 7:49 PM
>> To: kato-spec@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Conference Call
>>
>> Thanks for that Nicolas,
>>    I can now announce then that the meeting will be at 1500 to 1600 this
>> coming Friday. The conference call numbers will be posted before that time.
>> To join the untye meeting, please go here:
>> https://www.webdialogs.com/join/
>> The conference ID will be 2473033
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Stuart
>>
>> Nicholas Sterling wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>   I'm getting close to buttoning down the time for the conference call:
>>>>
>>>> So far I have the follow:
>>>>
>>>> Us: +1 UTC:  8:00 UTC - 17:00 UTC
>>>> Sonal: +5:30 UTC:    0300-0700, 1230-1730
>>>> Konstantin: +7 UTC:   0100-1600
>>>>
>>>> Nicholas, can you express the times your are available in UTC? Steve
>>>> told me that you were in Austin,
>>>> I assumed California (hence PST). If you are further west, that would be
>>>> a great help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Friday works fine for me during these UTC times:
>>> Nicholas: -5 UTC: 00:00 - 08:00, 15:00 - 23:59
>>> That is, if you can avoid the window 08:00-15:00 UTC, I can work around
>>> any other time.  Just offhand it looks like 1500-1600 is your best bet.
>>>
>>> Nicholas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> My suggestion is that the call is held on Friday. That gives time to
>>>> prepare, and we are all available that day.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>   Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rcolemail-kato@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Wednesday, Thursday and Friday are best for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Cole
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Wed, 15/4/09, Stuart Monteith <stukato@stoo.me.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Stuart Monteith <stukato@stoo.me.uk>
>>>>>> Subject: Conference Call
>>>>>> To: kato-spec@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, 15 April, 2009, 6:28 PM
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>   I would like to set up a conference call
>>>>>> for next week. Using the following: https://www.webdialogs.com/ it
is
>>>>>> possible to record
>>>>>> the call and the screen of the person hosting the meeting.
>>>>>> Anyone should be able to dial in, and if they wish, join the
>>>>>> meeting to view, for example, a web browser with the
>>>>>> JavaDoc. The recordings are in flash, but I'm sure we should
>>>>>> be able to extract the audio and also transcribe it for
>>>>>> posterity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If everyone is ok with this arrangement, I'd like to try
>>>>>> and arrange it for sometime next week. I've not arranged an
>>>>>> international conference call before, but can I suggest we
>>>>>> use UTC to state the times? For instance, UK working time is
>>>>>> currently 08:00 to 16:30 UTC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I estimate the time range from -7 UTC (California) through
>>>>>> -1 UTC (UK) into +3 UTC (Moscow) and +5:30 (India). This is
>>>>>> 12 1/2 hours. Please let me know if my estimate is
>>>>>> incorrect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I understand it the call would be to walk through the
>>>>>> API and clarify any issues people may have it (that's my
>>>>>> interpretation).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know what you think about dates and times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>   Stuart
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve Poole wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ant, We'll try our best  to make this as open as
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> possible - we should be
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> able to record the call at the very least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Steve Poole <
>>>>>>>> spoole167@googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Nicholas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sterling <
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nicholas.Sterling@sun.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Steve, if we do end up having a concall,
>>>>>> which I think would probably
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> help,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> would you mind if I invited Alan Bateman
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of the HotSpot team to attend?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure that would be fine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm sure you all know that the dev list is the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> preferred place for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> communication in Apache projects so phone calls
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can be frowned upon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They're not unheard of though, other projects do
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> use them on occasion,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and in this particular circumstance to help
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> explain the Kato seed code
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i think its ok. I'd hope that access would be open
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to anyone and via a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> publicized toll free number. Would also be great
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to make a recording
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of the call and put that up on the Kato website (i
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> know thats not
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> always possible to arrange).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   ...ant
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message