incubator-kalumet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dietz, Randall" <rand...@dietz.id.au>
Subject Re: Update on console refactor
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:06:20 GMT
That was a very interesting article, made some good points.

What I'm doing at the moment is building a REST api for kalumet, once
that's going I'll start playing with some js.

Watch this space, almost there
On Jan 29, 2015 2:25 PM, "Olivier Lamy" <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> you have some nice other options as: knockout (http://knockoutjs.com/) ,
> ember (http://emberjs.com/) or react (http://facebook.github.io/react/)
> I already used both knockout and ember, I found them very convenient.
> The new react sounds promising.
> Yup they are not as trendy as angular because they have the google
> marketing power :-)
> But they are stable, performant and take care of backward compat...
>
> :-)
>
>
> On 20 January 2015 at 22:20, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I reckon with all the recent changes with the angular dev I'm less
> > enthusiast
> > Read:
> http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2015/01/the_problem_wit.html
> >
> > On 14 January 2015 at 15:05, Dietz, Randall <randall@dietz.id.au> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not a guru in any particular JS framework (but I can learn quick
> >> enough), so I'm happy to follow your guys preferences from an
> >> overall project perspective.
> >>
> >> AngularJS was at the top of my list, not to mention that JB had already
> >> recommended it (I know, that should have been a clue).
> >>
> >> Your thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 12 January 2015 at 14:59, Dietz, Randall <randall@dietz.id.au>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks Oliver,
> >> > >
> >> > > Exacty the feedback I was looking for.
> >> > >
> >> > > I also prefer simple, but I wasn't quite sure what direction the
> >> project
> >> > > wanted to take so I simply decided to follow the echo-style
> >> > > framework approach.  Hence my recommendation to use Vaadin.
> >> > >
> >> > > But hey... I'm not wedded to Vaadin in any way, so I'm more than
> >> happy to
> >> > > use a totally diferent approach.
> >> > >
> >> > > How about I resurrect the JS webapp stuff I worked on and make an
> >> > > alternative proposal more in line with what you suggested?  I
> promise
> >> > I'll
> >> > > be just as motivated  :o)
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Sure be motivated!! :-)
> >> > What js techo will you be happy to use?
> >> >
> >> > Olivier
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > cheers -- Randall
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yup Vaadin is suitable.
> >> > > > I personally prefer don't use it and most of the time very happy
> to
> >> > use a
> >> > > > simple js frontend with REST services architecture.
> >> > > > But that's only my POV and as you look really motivated to do
the
> >> stuff
> >> > > > with Vaadin I won't complain too much :-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Happy to chase down more detail with some guidance...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > cheers -- Randall
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Olivier Lamy
> >> > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Olivier Lamy
> >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Lamy
> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message