Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 23:09:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>
To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <17783618.137.1344200822993.JavaMail.florian@ultron>
In-Reply-To: <DF04F0C8-2440-497A-8EB0-40052118C311@ecyrd.com>
Subject: Re: 3rd RC?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Janne,

true, I had already written down some notes on that before. There's pretty =
much to clean and simplify in our build process. But it's obviously been go=
od enough until now, so that can wait till after graduation, I'd think.

However, I'm wondering whether the library handling introduced in JSPWIKI-7=
38 could lead to problems later on. I've added some notes in JIRA.

Regards
 Florian


----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. August 2012 13:20:59
Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?


Okay, got it building. Artifacts are now again at http://people.apache.org/=
~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/

The problem is that the ant scripts (nor ant clean) don't seem to do a prop=
er cleanup. I don't check out a clean copy, I just svn switch my working co=
py around, and since ant clean doesn't really clean everything, old stuff i=
s still out there.  For example, hsqldb is not properly terminated at the e=
nd of run nor by ant clean.

By running "svn status" and manually removing all the files that were autog=
enerated I can rebuild it without problem.

/Janne

On Jul 29, 2012, at 23:47 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez wrote:

> Hi!
>=20
> done a fresh checkout from rc3 and could finish the ant clean signeddist
> without problems
>=20
>=20
> br,
> juan pablo
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com=
>wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> checked out the rc3, ant signeddist, no worky.
>>=20
>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 00:42 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi Janne,
>>>=20
>>> just tried it again with JDK 1.5.0_22 on Linux and JDK 1.6.0_33 on
>> Windows. Both are working fine.
>>>=20
>>> Name  Status  Type    Time(s)
>>> testIfPluginUserAllowed       Success         0.946
>>> testIfPluginUserNotAllowed    Success         0.126
>>> testIfPluginIPAllowed Success         0.083
>>> testIfPluginIPNotAllowed      Success         0.115
>>>=20
>>> These tests will fail on older versions of JSPWiki (see JSPWIKI-737). I=
s
>> v2.9.0-incubating-9 running in your test environment?
>>>=20
>>> Regards
>>> Florian
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 21:15:11
>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> D'oh... I'd roll a new release but I've got failing unit tests
>> (IfPluginTest).
>>>=20
>>> /Janne
>>>=20
>>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 10:39 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Now that's funny: What should have avoided confusion obviously led to
>> confusion :-)
>>>>=20
>>>> Janne, these are the old artifacts!
>>>>=20
>>>> Juan Pablo renamed tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to
>> tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc2.
>>>> The current one is still tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3!
>>>>=20
>>>> Regards
>>>> Florian
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2012 21:32:02
>>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Artifacts now at http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>>>>=20
>>>> /Janne
>>>>=20
>>>> On Jul 23, 2012, at 01:20 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I've just renamed rc2 to avoid confusion.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 2.9.0 should be real near now :-)
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> br,
>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>> florian@holeczek.de>wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Done! The tag is named jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>>>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012 21:38:20
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Just tag it and I'll build it from that tag :-)
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2012, at 20:46 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I'd consider 2.9.0-incubating-9 to be the third RC.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez" <juanpablo.santos@gmail.com=
>
>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 00:05:03
>>>>>>> Betreff: 3rd RC?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> couple of days ago I was finally able to solve my problems regardin=
g
>> the
>>>>>>> Lucene exceptions, as sad as it looks, in the most ancient
>> windows-way:
>>>>>>> rebooting (computer at home is up 99% of the time..). So I was
>> feeling
>>>>>> now
>>>>>>> would be a good moment to push a new RC, hoping that this time it
>> will
>>>>>>> become the first ASF release. Before doing that however, I was
>> thinking
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> pushing a coulpe of small changes:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> - upgrading commons-lang to commons-lang3: aside from the code, thi=
s
>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> imply upgrading other commons-* libraries, if they do depend on
>>>>>>> commons-lang and don't know if that would cause to 3rd party
>> plugins, if
>>>>>>> they do depend on that library. Another possibility could be simply
>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>> commons-lang to 2.6, which is the latest from 2.x and most probably
>> won't
>>>>>>> break anything.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> - a small refactor on LuceneSearchProvider (#1), mainly lines
>> 505-530, to
>>>>>>> retrieve and close Lucene indexes. Have that small change from days
>> ago,
>>>>>>> when I was pursuing ghosts; the functionally of the class remains
>> exactly
>>>>>>> the same, it's just a bit tinier.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> WDYT? Does anyone want to push in (or get pushed in) any other thin=
g
>>>>>> before
>>>>>>> making the next RC?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> [#1]
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>> http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/coverage_2.9.0-incubating-3/org.apac=
he.wiki.search.LuceneSearchProvider.html
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20