Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:19:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>
To: JSPWiki developer list <jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Message-ID: <2527539.63.1343657844071.JavaMail.florian@ultron>
In-Reply-To: <10651400.57.1343657667556.JavaMail.florian@ultron>
Subject: Fwd: Raptor editor
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry, forgot the CC...

----- Forwarded Mail -----
Von: "Florian Holeczek" <florian@holeczek.de>
An: jspwiki-user@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 16:17:00
Betreff: Re: Raptor editor

Hi Don, (CC to the dev list)

quite sure about that, since GPLv2 isn't a compatible license.
However, there's no need for the licenses to be compatible, as long as that=
 piece of software isn't part of the JSPWiki (let's call it core distributi=
on) itself.

@Devs: This is leading to an interesting question: Will users be allowed to=
 upload (third party) patches, plugins etc. to a jspwiki.org site hosted at=
 ASF, if they're not compatible with the Apache License?

Regards
 Florian


----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
Von: "Donald Whytock" <dwhytock@gmail.com>
An: jspwiki-user@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 15:57:09
Betreff: Re: Raptor editor

The license page says Raptor is "distributed under the GPL Open Source
license."  Does it have to explicitly say what version of GPL it's
licensed under, in order to be compatible with Apache?  Or is one
assumed?

Don

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Dave Koelmeyer
<dave.koelmeyer@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Looks nice - anyone have first hand experience with it or know if it woul=
d
> work with a bit of massaging with JSPWiki?
>
> http://www.raptor-editor.com/
>
> --
> Dave Koelmeyer
> http://www.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
>