Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:42:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>
To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <22298377.103.1343252387655.JavaMail.florian@ultron>
In-Reply-To: <D09554E8-296E-4080-9AA8-0AF72219CDA3@ecyrd.com>
Subject: Re: 3rd RC?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Janne,

just tried it again with JDK 1.5.0_22 on Linux and JDK 1.6.0_33 on Windows.=
 Both are working fine.

Name=09Status=09Type=09Time(s)
testIfPluginUserAllowed=09Success=09=090.946
testIfPluginUserNotAllowed=09Success=09=090.126
testIfPluginIPAllowed=09Success=09=090.083
testIfPluginIPNotAllowed=09Success=09=090.115

These tests will fail on older versions of JSPWiki (see JSPWIKI-737). Is v2=
.9.0-incubating-9 running in your test environment?

Regards
 Florian


----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 21:15:11
Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?


D'oh... I'd roll a new release but I've got failing unit tests (IfPluginTes=
t).

/Janne

On Jul 24, 2012, at 10:39 , Florian Holeczek wrote:

> Now that's funny: What should have avoided confusion obviously led to con=
fusion :-)
>=20
> Janne, these are the old artifacts!
>=20
> Juan Pablo renamed tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc=
2.
> The current one is still tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3!
>=20
> Regards
> Florian
>=20
>=20
> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2012 21:32:02
> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>=20
>=20
> Artifacts now at http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>=20
> /Janne
>=20
> On Jul 23, 2012, at 01:20 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez wrote:
>=20
>> Hi!
>>=20
>> I've just renamed rc2 to avoid confusion.
>>=20
>> 2.9.0 should be real near now :-)
>>=20
>>=20
>> br,
>> juan pablo
>>=20
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>=
wrote:
>>=20
>>> Done! The tag is named jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>>>=20
>>> Regards
>>> Florian
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012 21:38:20
>>> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Just tag it and I'll build it from that tag :-)
>>>=20
>>> /Janne
>>>=20
>>> On Jul 22, 2012, at 20:46 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>=20
>>>> I'd consider 2.9.0-incubating-9 to be the third RC.
>>>>=20
>>>> Regards
>>>> Florian
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail -----
>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez" <juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 00:05:03
>>>> Betreff: 3rd RC?
>>>>=20
>>>> Hi,
>>>>=20
>>>> couple of days ago I was finally able to solve my problems regarding t=
he
>>>> Lucene exceptions, as sad as it looks, in the most ancient windows-way=
:
>>>> rebooting (computer at home is up 99% of the time..). So I was feeling
>>> now
>>>> would be a good moment to push a new RC, hoping that this time it will
>>>> become the first ASF release. Before doing that however, I was thinkin=
g
>>> of
>>>> pushing a coulpe of small changes:
>>>>=20
>>>> - upgrading commons-lang to commons-lang3: aside from the code, this
>>> could
>>>> imply upgrading other commons-* libraries, if they do depend on
>>>> commons-lang and don't know if that would cause to 3rd party plugins, =
if
>>>> they do depend on that library. Another possibility could be simply
>>> upgrade
>>>> commons-lang to 2.6, which is the latest from 2.x and most probably wo=
n't
>>>> break anything.
>>>>=20
>>>> - a small refactor on LuceneSearchProvider (#1), mainly lines 505-530,=
 to
>>>> retrieve and close Lucene indexes. Have that small change from days ag=
o,
>>>> when I was pursuing ghosts; the functionally of the class remains exac=
tly
>>>> the same, it's just a bit tinier.
>>>>=20
>>>> WDYT? Does anyone want to push in (or get pushed in) any other thing
>>> before
>>>> making the next RC?
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> br,
>>>> juan pablo
>>>>=20
>>>> [#1]
>>>>=20
>>> http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/coverage_2.9.0-incubating-3/org.apa=
che.wiki.search.LuceneSearchProvider.html
>>>=20
>>>=20