incubator-jspwiki-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 3rd RC?
Date Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:20:31 GMT
Hi!

I've just renamed rc2 to avoid confusion.

2.9.0 should be real near now :-)


br,
juan pablo

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>wrote:

> Done! The tag is named jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>
> Regards
>  Florian
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012 21:38:20
> Betreff: Re: 3rd RC?
>
>
> Just tag it and I'll build it from that tag :-)
>
> /Janne
>
> On Jul 22, 2012, at 20:46 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd consider 2.9.0-incubating-9 to be the third RC.
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 00:05:03
> > Betreff: 3rd RC?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > couple of days ago I was finally able to solve my problems regarding the
> > Lucene exceptions, as sad as it looks, in the most ancient windows-way:
> > rebooting (computer at home is up 99% of the time..). So I was feeling
> now
> > would be a good moment to push a new RC, hoping that this time it will
> > become the first ASF release. Before doing that however, I was thinking
> of
> > pushing a coulpe of small changes:
> >
> > - upgrading commons-lang to commons-lang3: aside from the code, this
> could
> > imply upgrading other commons-* libraries, if they do depend on
> > commons-lang and don't know if that would cause to 3rd party plugins, if
> > they do depend on that library. Another possibility could be simply
> upgrade
> > commons-lang to 2.6, which is the latest from 2.x and most probably won't
> > break anything.
> >
> > - a small refactor on LuceneSearchProvider (#1), mainly lines 505-530, to
> > retrieve and close Lucene indexes. Have that small change from days ago,
> > when I was pursuing ghosts; the functionally of the class remains exactly
> > the same, it's just a bit tinier.
> >
> > WDYT? Does anyone want to push in (or get pushed in) any other thing
> before
> > making the next RC?
> >
> >
> > br,
> > juan pablo
> >
> > [#1]
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/coverage_2.9.0-incubating-3/org.apache.wiki.search.LuceneSearchProvider.html
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message