incubator-jspwiki-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Date Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:06:13 GMT
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk


thanks heaps! :-)


On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:

>
> What's the svn tag?
>
> /Janne
>
> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the
> > WOT", which currently I don't have.
> >
> > I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
> > 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc
> of
> > JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > juan pablo
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > <janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
> >>
> >> /Janne
> >>
> >> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Juan Pablo,
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
> >>>
> >>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
> >> notice if anything was incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the
> >> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
> >> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to
> instructions.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Florian
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
> >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
> >>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
> >>>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
> >>>
> >>> 6 Binding +1 votes
> >>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> >>> 0 +0 votes
> >>> 1 Binding -1 votes
> >>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
> >>>
> >>> Binding +1 votes from:
> >>> Andrew Jaquith
> >>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> >>> Florian Holeczek
> >>> Harry Metske
> >>> Dirk Frederecick
> >>> Janne Jalkannen
> >>>
> >>> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> >>> Michael Gerzabek
> >>> Christophe Dupriez
> >>> Jürgen Weber
> >>> Siegfried Goeschl
> >>> Luca Gilardoni
> >>>
> >>> Binding -1 votes from:
> >>> Sam Ruby
> >>>
> >>> Non-binding -1 from:
> >>> Ross Gardler
> >>>
> >>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
> >>>
> >>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
> >>>
> >>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
> >> although
> >>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting
> until
> >>> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> >>> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> >>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> >>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
> >>>
> >>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> >>> graduation.
> >>>
> >>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> >>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed.
> >> The
> >>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once
> >> we
> >>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning
> the
> >>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> >>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> >>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> >>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were
> >> more
> >>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
> >>>
> >>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> >>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which
> >> is
> >>> the general feeling.
> >>>
> >>> My suggested steps would be:
> >>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the
> ASF
> >>> way
> >>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> >>> some mock-ups on this)
> >>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> >>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> >>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
> >> approval,
> >>> proceed with IPMC vote
> >>>
> >>> So, what do you think?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> juan pablo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message