incubator-jspwiki-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Wolf <dave.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Date Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:05:35 GMT
D'oh... Janne, make that "shall I create a patch with the proposed saved-src
directories". :-)

Dave Wolf

"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela


On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Dave Wolf <dave.wolf@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus
> on what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will work.
> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've only
> performed our development work in release / functionality specific branches.
>
>
> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. & saved-tests/WebContent/...
> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better.  But I'd still keep it
>> in the trunk.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>> supported
>> > part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
>> > easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>> reduce
>> > the scope when debugging.
>> >
>> > Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
>> the
>> > truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dave Wolf
>> > H: <303-377-9537>303-377-9537
>> > M: <303-956-9106>303-956-9106
>> >
>> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dave,
>> >>
>> >> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>> >> one).
>> >> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>> wysiwyg
>> >> editor that were not resolved yet.
>> >> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
>> >> willing to give some support on it.
>> >> JSPWiki can work without it.
>> >>
>> >> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>> ignored
>> >> it).
>> >> I did run the unit tests:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >> Harry
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>> >>> possible
>> >>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>> >> certainly
>> >>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>> >>>
>> >>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>> >>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>> >>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>> >>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>> >> (nor
>> >>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>> >>>
>> >>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>> >>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>> >> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>> >>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>> branch
>> >>> tho.
>> >>>
>> >>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
>> for
>> >> my
>> >>> environment.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>
>> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> life
>> >>> that
>> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>> >>> happens
>> >>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> /Janne
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Dave,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit
more
>> >>> specific
>> >>>> ?
>> >>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
>> war
>> >>>> file,
>> >>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
>> JSPWiki
>> >>>> URL.
>> >>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out
of 1029
>> >>>> tests).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> regards,
>> >>>>> Harry
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in?  There
were
>> several
>> >>>> build
>> >>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
>> reference
>> >>> to
>> >>>> it
>> >>>>>> is out of date.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>> that
>> >>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
Mandela
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>> >> florian@holeczek.de
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> Florian
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <florian@holeczek.de>,
"Janne Jalkanen" <
>> >>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought
maybe I'd
>> >> work
>> >>> on
>> >>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the
2.8 branch
>> --
>> >>>> looks
>> >>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr
branch
>> >> instead.
>> >>> I
>> >>>>>> also
>> >>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report
attached
>> to
>> >>> the
>> >>>>>> JIRA
>> >>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not
a match with
>> >>> 2.8.
>> >>>>>> code
>> >>>>>>> base.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository?
It
>> >> seems
>> >>>> from
>> >>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing
a v 3.0 alpha
>> >>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in
settling for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living."
--Nelson
>> >>> Mandela
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>> >>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to
contribute.
>> >> Seems
>> >>>> as
>> >>>>>> if
>> >>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the
release, as
>> >> Janne
>> >>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would
be ready
>> to
>> >>> try
>> >>>>>> ;)
>> >>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems
to be quite
>> >>>> good.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least
give a top
>> >>>> level
>> >>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>> >>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done
by Andrew
>> >>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface
(JSR-170),
>> >>> mainly
>> >>>>>>> done by Janne
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase
and
>> have
>> >> a
>> >>>>>> look
>> >>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> Florian
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute
to the
>> code
>> >>>> base.
>> >>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while
('er
>> years)
>> >>> and
>> >>>> I
>> >>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit
of time to
>> >>>> devote
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in
settling for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
Mandela
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>> >>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the
only thing
>> blocking
>> >>> TLP
>> >>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a
release (in JIRA) is
>> >> a
>> >>>>>> set
>> >>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these
days (I
>> >> believe
>> >>>> all
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing
heavily
>> on
>> >>>>>> their
>> >>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the
release
>> >> process?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up
and say if they
>> >> have
>> >>> a
>> >>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to
help. We need
>> >>> people
>> >>>>>> who
>> >>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing
to
>> >> contribute
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> codebase.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> /Janne
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message