incubator-jspwiki-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Janne Jalkanen <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Date Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:00 GMT

Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better.  But I'd still keep it in the trunk.

/Janne

On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:

> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the supported
> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might reduce
> the scope when debugging.
> 
> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
> 
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
> H: 303-377-9537
> M: 303-956-9106
> 
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Dave,
>> 
>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>> one).
>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a wysiwyg
>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
>> willing to give some support on it.
>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>> 
>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have ignored
>> it).
>> I did run the unit tests:
>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>> 
>> regards,
>> Harry
>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>> 
>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>> possible
>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>> certainly
>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>> 
>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>> (nor
>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>> 
>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
>>> tho.
>>> 
>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for
>> my
>>> environment.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>> 
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>> happens
>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>> 
>>>> /Janne
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dave,
>>>>> 
>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>> specific
>>>> ?
>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
>>>> file,
>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
>>>> URL.
>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
>>>> tests).
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Harry
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in?  There were several
>>>> build
>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
>>> to
>>>> it
>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
a
>>> life
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <dave.wolf@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <florian@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen"
<
>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>> work
>>> on
>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch
--
>>>> looks
>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>> instead.
>>> I
>>>>>> also
>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached
to
>>> the
>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
with
>>> 2.8.
>>>>>> code
>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>> seems
>>>> from
>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
for a
>>> life
>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>> Mandela
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>> Seems
>>>> as
>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release,
as
>> Janne
>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready
to
>>> try
>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
quite
>>>> good.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give
a top
>>>> level
>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>>> mainly
>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
have
>> a
>>>>>> look
>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
code
>>>> base.
>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
years)
>>> and
>>>> I
>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time
to
>>>> devote
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
for a
>>> life
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
blocking
>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in
JIRA) is
>> a
>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days
(I
>> believe
>>>> all
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily
on
>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>> process?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if
they
>> have
>>> a
>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We
need
>>> people
>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>> contribute
>>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message