Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
 designates 193.64.5.122 as permitted sender)
Message-Id: <A8AFBAEC-45C7-41C1-AE90-E66C21AAEDDA@ecyrd.com>
From: Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <u2u3a6c97f01005020240jaa315d7axb42c5693f774149@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: handling of JIRA issues
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 13:41:04 +0300
References: <4BDD3E51.1050200@holeczek.de>
 <u2u3a6c97f01005020240jaa315d7axb42c5693f774149@mail.gmail.com>


Perhaps we should delegate them to a "Future version"? That way they  
would stay open, but not show up in most lists.

/Janne

On May 2, 2010, at 12:40 , Harry Metske wrote:

> Florian,
>
> I just try to keep the list of open issues to a reasonable size.
> There are so many issues that are open for years with no activity at  
> all,
> they just clutter up the list.
> Every now and then I walk through the list and propose to close some  
> issues
> that appear to be abandoned and are not serious bugs.
>
> But if we want to keep those open, that's fine too.
>
> best regards,
> Harry
>
>
> 2010/5/2 Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de>
>
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> recently you've commented some issues with the question whether we  
>> get a
>> patch, otherwise we'd close this issue.
>>
>> IMO we shouldn't do this, as long as it's a valid issue.
>>
>> Why would you want to close them?
>>
>> Regards
>> Florian
>>