Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jspwiki-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99892 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2009 14:01:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2009 14:01:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 92955 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2009 14:01:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jspwiki-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92939 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2009 14:01:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92928 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2009 14:01:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:01:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harry.metske@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.213] (HELO mail-bw0-f213.google.com) (209.85.218.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:01:38 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2405569bwz.12 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:01:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hZAHkA33SeHD+4ICyAzcgnbg5ZVEz7HI/r9ECF0YHlo=; b=ZJEMij87y75n9X/K19WvH7zoVSfIwYNy/BA0eGxjeEPHUcS2rjbSUTInrz0TsdOPr8 VazNkLer7opSc2OpAeCzL6sf0Jg3guYgcslD1OwZa7bLDNX4QUxe4lLZZDBYz7v3FNMm CdJcR/K7d9g+sSfDyVvGjii42UCc3lZHU+Mu4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NFpYAzcldAjGeRFYJ/fICseYtYxlOK8Nz6Dfc1LdLx4I3mcwMRpVkS/Tj0/deD0XQs 7DZP8Ae4JAwM7b6JHsE5liQpUbvGxgCVt11Cyjt6cBpq9RRzbNSw0Pu5S+iPRa9AuVBg 3s0bIsqcuFSWfl8VLxFd0Fv3R3IZihAmOLwhg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.107.135 with SMTP id b7mr2635875fap.30.1234706478049; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:01:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:01:17 +0100 Message-ID: <3a6c97f00902150601m7a4b671ft8c563d8c2bd0704@mail.gmail.com> Subject: JUnit test performance From: Harry Metske To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b31406aa480462f5812f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b31406aa480462f5812f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have been looking a bit at the performance of our JUnit tests and summarized it at : http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/JUnit%20Test%20performance In short: - JUnit tests for 3.0 take 3 times longer than for 2.8 - I like to suggest using attribute forkmode="once" maxmemory="512m" in the tests task in build.xml Any other suggestions are welcome. Harry --001636c5b31406aa480462f5812f--