Mailing-List: contact jspwiki-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <1740060284.1224804824274.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Harry Metske (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JSPWIKI-376) Move from log4j to slf4j
In-Reply-To: <1305924645.1221429464334.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642343#action_12642343 ] 

Harry Metske commented on JSPWIKI-376:
--------------------------------------

OK, it sounds to me that it makes sense to jump over to slf4j.

> Move from log4j to slf4j
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: JSPWIKI-376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-376
>             Project: JSPWiki
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core & storage
>            Reporter: Janne Jalkanen
>            Assignee: Harry Metske
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> SLF4J allows far more flexible logging than log4j, and it would allow us to get rid of these dumb log4j compatibility problems that sometimes occur.  It also plays better with other applications, gives the user more power to choose how to log his stuff, and is also pretty cool otherwise. The change would be relatively trivial, and would probably be largely invisible to the users (since we could continue shipping with necessary log4j jars).
> http://www.slf4j.org
> The license is MIT/X11, so that's fine.
> Opinions?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.