incubator-jspwiki-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dirk Frederickx" <>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (JSPWIKI-276) Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:13:57 GMT

We are using straight ajax calls with cover the rpc protocol based on
the mootools library.
Look at the jsonrpc function in jspwiki-common.js, who does all the work.

The call is something like this:

Wiki.jsonrpc('', [param1,param2], caalbackfunction);


On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Harry Metske (JIRA) <> wrote:
>    [
> Harry Metske commented on JSPWIKI-276:
> --------------------------------------
> Well, according to it is indeed "end of the line"
and has moved to jabsorb.
> I did some local experiments and followed the migration instructions from
> There is only one thing where I get stuck, and that's because I can't find a jsonrpc.js
in JSPWiki that should be replaced with the jabsorb version.
> Completing all other steps and building (with slf4j and slf4j-log4j) goes fine, it passes
all tests and all webtests.
> Running it on my test server however I don't get instant search results from the Quick
Navigation field top right. Pressing enter gives me proper results, and also using the Search
page works fine.
> Do I need some javascript guru here.....
>> Use jabsorb instead of jsonrpc
>> ------------------------------
>>                 Key: JSPWIKI-276
>>                 URL:
>>             Project: JSPWiki
>>          Issue Type: Improvement
>>    Affects Versions: 2.6.2
>>            Reporter: Jorge Ferrer
>>            Priority: Trivial
>> jsonrpc seems to be unmaintained and jabsorb ( seems to be the
new fork of that project. Migrating should to be quite simple.
>> Besides the new features added to jabsorb, a very good reason to migrate is because
this type library is sensitive to security related bugs so it's very desired to use one that
is well maintained. Just in case.
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message