incubator-jena-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <>
Subject Re: FreeMarker license
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:49:18 GMT
Stanbol is using freemarker as well. To satisfy the license condition
I think the notice file must contain an acknowledgement in the notice
file and the license in the license file.


On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Andy Seaborne <> wrote:
> On 22/02/12 12:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> The 4-clause BSD license does not seem to appear on
>> at all. So I think you need
>> to go to legal.
> Thanks - and it's not 4 clause BSD in the usual sense.  It's their license,
> it is vaguely BSD as they claim but it's a different 4 clauses.
>> I confess that I don't understand the problem with JSP pages in the
>> first place. All the pieces you need are either Apache or Eclipse in
>> my experience.
> Jetty uses Glassfish to get it's JSP code and, eventually, CDDL (?). And you
> end up shipping ecj.  That said, the whole Jasper trail is quite confusing.
>  The licensing needs tracking down because it's redistribution, not just use
> of.
> It may be possible to pick out of the Tomcat code, but the packaging seemed
> to lead me to Tomcat specific code eventually.  Switching wholesale to
> embedded Tomcat is possible, but quite a lot larger than embedded Jetty
> (extra 3-4Mbytes in 15M).
> But I'm not a fan of JSPs anyway so this is an opportunity to not have them
> at all.
>        Andy

View raw message