Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-jena-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2C8B9E4D for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90792 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2011 15:50:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90765 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2011 15:50:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jena-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90757 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2011 15:50:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:50:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of castagna.lists@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:50:11 +0000 Received: by wyh5 with SMTP id 5so5391wyh.6 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dI9m63fNzUGN70J4cEuB3qU36N3hNvtN/QY92Nagd3c=; b=j4A8zM8hKozOA+QryCJC/PhCJGtXVPhvqX2FoVKiKuTe6L1fTQoRxDODq2d1bOJMjE DzmjxsijNeaPDVI4WtGN58SG4c9IR9uqEIMOk4WK1V4Ez/MCX4w/cnKQRcSF41S5qJyN 0Pwkn8Csx82PtDxMvabIaNFJAVXdlGyyamPOc= Received: by 10.227.199.5 with SMTP id eq5mr9728243wbb.2.1319903390129; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (79-66-215-8.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [79.66.215.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en13sm16544048wbb.22.2011.10.29.08.49.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EAC209A.1040000@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:49:46 +0100 From: Paolo Castagna User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Jenkins builds - various References: <4EAB0B70.1070508@apache.org> <4EAB0FF4.4080305@googlemail.com> <4EABBD0D.1080507@apache.org> <4EABD83E.3000800@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4EABD83E.3000800@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Andy Seaborne wrote: > I may have "fixed" the build for "Jena IRI". > > Having created a temporary job that worked, I deleted the Jenkins job > completely and created a new one. > > Otherwise it was seeing old files (specifically, a POM with a relative > parent; also I had one instance of it reporting a parse error in the > parent POM chain ... but I hadn't checked anything in. > > The error occurs elsewhere (e.g. Jena_Core) but I've run out of energy > to fix that, then the next one and the next one, .... > > Deleting the workspace of a job does not fix the problem, nor does a > clean checkout. > > Slave machine "windows1" looks to be a bad machine to get for a job. But > it seems to be the machine you get if you don't restrict the job, > possibly it's lightly because it doesn't work very well but I can't > gather concrete evidence. > > I'm setting jobs to "ubuntu" > > Sorry about the noise on jena-commits ... Hi Andy Just an hypothesis to explain these problems. The machines used by Jenkins have a Maven repository used to cache artifacts including pom.xml files. Maybe, for some reason, one or more pom.xml files in the Maven cache on the machines used by Jenkins have not been updated. Feel free to ignore Jenkins and just make all the changes you want to make, I'll then look at what's going on with Jenkins and fix the problems. Don't waste time with it, if you don't want to. Having two pom.xml files double the amount of testing, having some projects using pom.xml (old) and pom2.xml (new) and other use pom.xml (new) and pom1.xml (old), just increase the probability of making mistakes. Paolo > > Andy