Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96290 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 17:47:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 17:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 37719 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 17:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37697 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 17:47:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jena-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37689 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 17:47:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:47:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henry.saputra@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:47:22 +0000 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so2949642bwz.25 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:47:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ohs+PwQhy4rvCeQfzjBkpVqddZnFJAXTizLOI8tWUEA=; b=b22JVmLA/zrZeoVvcXw+kEnSQ+vi5sr1bkVDMoNfRu/Ltt+i0CyhFl9ZDc4b8GApqO 6LK6G6A0HjzFqA1pd0B1KwVH8GSz+YlCU4s4i3mOewcLNJgH0oofJbF3vldNA5Pvpp8J XGVF86a2fCIZ6DHi1oOOQPxZnJ1tgvoJWxb9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aPEFjMDnblqJSyHTTD59ZtZEzpwJO97qL0MsiHnpem1nDdWRqDXEdtd2qlu2cCBizV TMge+WdMvppZ9fEO3ydGASzRuHV9Fk8zn6552oW49K2zbOQBanOWjGl2Ec/YAOxXre2t p3r3X7yj8o38UQ+lDKZ7E930IOSyIyvp0TjbA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.118.7 with SMTP id t7mr3705056bkq.87.1291916820503; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.70.5 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:47:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D00D597.5080008@epimorphics.com> References: <1291895898.2462.40.camel@dave-desktop> <4D00D597.5080008@epimorphics.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:47:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: List target for JIRA case creation should be jena-dev instea of jena-commits? From: Henry Saputra To: jena-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think most developers will join the @dev list to follow what new direction for Jena which also includes new bugs coming in, but I think only few that concern about checkins will also join the @commits list. - Henry On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Ian Dickinson wrote: > On 09/12/10 11:58, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:15 -0500, Dave wrote: >>> Sometimes projects direct everything to dev, sometimes they send SVN >>> and JIRA notifications to a separate list. I think this is up to the >>> project to decide. >>> >>> I don't have a strong feeling about this, what do others think? Folks >>> agree with Henry? >> >> I'd tend to have JIRA notifications on @jena-dev and commits on >> @jena-commit > +1 > > Ian > > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Ian Dickinson =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 Epimorphics Ltd, Bristol, UK > mailto:ian@epimorphics.com =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.epimorph= ics.com > cell: +44-7786-850536 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0lan= dline: +44-1275-399069 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Epimorphics Ltd. =C2=A0is a limited company registered in England > (no. 7016688). Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High St, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Portishead, Bristol BS20 = 6PT, UK > > --=20 Thanks, Henry