incubator-isis-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Haywood <...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
Subject Re: Deployment type of Wicket viewer
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:59:27 GMT
Probably as a workaround (now I think about it) for the problem that you
hit... that having a deployment type of SERVER means that the "file"
authoriser is installed by default.

If we get rid of that logic in InstallerLookupDefault where the type of
authorizer is dependent on the deployment type, and instead always just
install the "dflt" (ie no-op0 authorizer if not specified, then I'd be
happy for it to have a deployment type of SERVER.

Dan


On 16 October 2012 21:56, Robert Matthews <rmatthews@nakedobjects.org>wrote:

> Dan
>
> Further to our conversation earlier, is there any reason that the Wicket
> viewer defaults to a prototype server (a specific Wicket type) where as any
> other webapp, such as Scimpi, defaults to server (one of the generic
> deployment types)?
>
> Rob
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message