incubator-isis-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Matthews <rmatth...@nakedobjects.org>
Subject Re: Deployment type of Wicket viewer
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:23:49 GMT
Fine.  Again, let's deal with this when we review DeploymentType.


On 16/10/12 21:59, Dan Haywood wrote:
> Probably as a workaround (now I think about it) for the problem that you
> hit... that having a deployment type of SERVER means that the "file"
> authoriser is installed by default.
>
> If we get rid of that logic in InstallerLookupDefault where the type of
> authorizer is dependent on the deployment type, and instead always just
> install the "dflt" (ie no-op0 authorizer if not specified, then I'd be
> happy for it to have a deployment type of SERVER.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 16 October 2012 21:56, Robert Matthews <rmatthews@nakedobjects.org>wrote:
>
>> Dan
>>
>> Further to our conversation earlier, is there any reason that the Wicket
>> viewer defaults to a prototype server (a specific Wicket type) where as any
>> other webapp, such as Scimpi, defaults to server (one of the generic
>> deployment types)?
>>
>> Rob
>>


Mime
View raw message