Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-isis-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-isis-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71EE97E6B for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11042 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2011 19:22:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-isis-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10994 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2011 19:22:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact isis-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10986 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2011 19:22:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dkhaywood@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:22:05 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so526961wwi.0 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:21:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=cdxVvQnwOmvhbtnpEgBEjrUZciHmwRtU2CRRQ0vTg74=; b=cWRE6Iyn/umZXvqcY6Y82sAvbOiU1nGExQNH7PShQDyg8Ve1iGxgbf3CYvayScKRoh aqp8HeElNK2sinEE0xEz++k8Y2l9nfxJit01fgVISMuAvXSNhPI00avLt52lQ8P3MgBs VZqsXl1d4cIrg2KetGBlzjDbchivETfFRwVsg= Received: by 10.216.255.20 with SMTP id i20mr7981937wes.32.1311189705176; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.66] (host86-159-29-98.range86-159.btcentralplus.com [86.159.29.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g55sm377854wee.11.2011.07.20.12.21.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E272AC7.9080703@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:21:43 +0100 From: Dan Haywood Reply-To: dan@haywood-associates.co.uk Organization: Haywood Associates Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: commit messages and JIRA References: <4E230C92.7020006@gmail.com> <4E25763B.1010007@nakedobjects.org> <4E2678A3.2090200@gmail.com> <4E269AC2.1040703@nakedobjects.org> <6D6642C3-4F39-44CF-B6DD-D183004983EC@googlemail.com> <4E26A6E5.3050206@nakedobjects.org> In-Reply-To: <4E26A6E5.3050206@nakedobjects.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090609060304060305060809" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------090609060304060305060809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20/07/2011 10:59, Robert Matthews wrote: > Let's go with umbrella ticket and revise the plan as we see fit. Along > as we don't ignore that spelling mistake, leave in the poor formatting > or forsake improving the codes readability then we'll be fine, but if > we find ourselves thinking better of it then we should worry. Agreed, we don't want to have impediments to improving the codebase. But on the other hand if we want to build the community that has confidence in our code then we should also follow - and be seen to be following - good software engineering practices. At any rate... I've updated ISIS-107 to be for "miscellaneous edits" for the Isis 0.2.0 release. I've also changed it to have an issue type of "Umbrella". Let's see how things go, as you say. Thx Dan > > Rob > > On 20/07/11 10:44, Dan Haywood wrote: >> If we make an exception then it's a slippery slope... how small is >> small? >> >> It doesn't take long to create a new ticket in jira. My view is that >> an umbrella ticket is a reasonable compromise. >> >> Dan > --------------090609060304060305060809--