Mailing-List: contact isis-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.de;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=ohsSLwwNUhYlPYXi5cppY9LzlgbjwtWNSWt4MVje7t73i1tcZKf/sdASfR3ZXF8tBe5hQbOSoqingSA68bbtg56iUxPst8RSjsIKx5fKy4LL2LTpzP2OQaLcauowKkqNz2YmPMf3KQGo8CPMtjpRaYU7ElJkriwMRuK50dKXmwo=;
Message-ID: <896080.5779.qm@web27803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:22:51 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate
 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <4E003704.3000606@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

no problem. =0A=0AIt's our first release, but it wont be the last ;)=0A=0AT=
hanks for all the hard work on it!=0A=0ALieGrue,=0Astrub=0A=0A=0A--- On Tue=
, 6/21/11, Dan Haywood <dkhaywood@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Dan Haywoo=
d <dkhaywood@gmail.com>=0A> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis releas=
e candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating=0A> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org=0A> =
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 6:15 AM=0A> For some reason I'm hitting a pro=
blem=0A> trying to upload the "final" =0A> release artifacts up to the stag=
ing repo...=A0 I've=0A> tried 3 times now, in =0A> each case it uploads the=
 first big artifact (the=0A> source-release.zip), =0A> appears to hang for =
~70 minutes, and then I get a 500=0A> server error.=0A> =0A> Given that we =
do have RC4 voted on and the "final" release=0A> would be =0A> identical in=
 content, how do people feel about me putting=0A> the RC4 =0A> forward for =
voting on in general@incubator.a.o?=A0=0A> It'd be nice to get =0A> that re=
lease out, and my week's a little busy to try to=0A> track down this =0A> u=
pload problem.=0A> =0A> Thx=0A> Dan=0A> =0A> =0A> On 20/06/2011 17:11, Mark=
 Struberg wrote:=0A> > Hi Dan!=0A> >=0A> > Yes, please go on rolling a new =
'final' release now=0A> ;)=0A> >=0A> > As Benson explained already, there i=
s usually no need=0A> to do -rc stuff upfront since we use staging repos (w=
hich we=0A> can drop if the content is not perfect).=0A> >=0A> > LieGrue,=
=0A> > strub=0A> >=0A> > --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.c=
om>=A0=0A> wrote:=0A> >=0A> >> From: Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>=0A> >=
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release=0A> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-=
incubating=0A> >> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org=0A> >> Date: Monday, Ju=
ne 20, 2011, 12:31 PM=0A> >> OK... so I'll now push out a final=0A> >> rele=
ase to vote on again (because I=0A> >> presume we don't want our first rele=
ase to have an=0A> RC=0A> >> postfix).=0A> >>=0A> >> This will be the same =
content, but just with the=0A> POM=0A> >> versions updated. =0A> >> Details=
 in the next vote thread.=0A> >>=0A> >> Dan=0A> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~=0A> >>=0A> >=
> On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote:=0A> >>> Hi Dan!=0A> >>>=0A> >>>=
 I've seen you did some tagging, branching=0A> _after_ we=0A> >> voted. I k=
now this is kind of nit picking but we=0A> must ship=0A> >> _exactly_ the s=
ource binary we've voted on! No=0A> single bit=0A> >> change is allowed, th=
at must have the exact same=0A> sha1!=0A> >>> Of course, we can do a releas=
e without the=0A> -RCx=0A> >> postfix, but we would then need to re-do the =
vote=0A> again.=0A> >>> I know this sounds ridiculous in the first=0A> mome=
nt, but=0A> >> if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that=0A> nothing=
=0A> >> important got changed?=0A> >>> LieGrue,=0A> >>> strub=0A> >>>=0A> >=
>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>=0A> >> wrote:=0A> =
>>>> From: Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>=0A> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [R=
ESULT] Apache Isis=0A> release=0A> >> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating=0A> >>=
>> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org=0A> >>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, =
10:55 AM=0A> >>>> Nour,=0A> >>>> will do...=0A> >>>>=0A> >>>> can I ask tho=
ugh that you please don't=0A> post to general@incubator.a.o,=0A> >>>>=0A> >=
>>> because I would like to.=A0 (I want to=0A> explain=0A> >> how the=0A> >=
>>> release I would=0A> >>>> like the vote on general relates to the=0A> re=
lease=0A> >> candidate=0A> >>>> that was voted=0A> >>>> on in isis-dev).=0A=
> >>>>=0A> >>>> Thx=0A> >>>> Dan=0A> >>>>=0A> >>>>=0A> >>>>=0A> >>>> On 20/=
06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din=0A> wrote:=0A> >>>>> +1 @Mark=0A> >>>>>=
=0A> >>>>> Would you please do it Dan so I=0A> announce the=0A> >> [VOTE]=
=0A> >>>> pass on general@=0A> >>>>> and then we are ready to [VOTE] on=0A>=
 there.=0A> >>>>>=0A> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM,=0A> Mark=0A> =
>> Struberg<struberg@yahoo.de>=0A> >>>> wrote:=0A> >>>>>> Hi Dan!=0A> >>>>>=
>=0A> >>>>>> It's usus to explicitly list the=0A> names=0A> >> (or=0A> >>>>=
 apacheids) of those who voted. Just to=0A> make it a=0A> >> bit easier=0A>=
 >>>> to control. Could you please add those?=0A> >>>>>> txs and LieGrue,=
=0A> >>>>>> strub=0A> >>>>>>=0A> >>>>>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan=0A> Haywoo=
d<dkhaywood@gmail.com>=0A> >>>> wrote:=0A> >>>>>>> From: Dan Haywood<dkhayw=
ood@gmail.com>=0A> >>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT]=0A> Apache Isis=0A> >> =
release=0A> >>>> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating=0A> >>>>>>> To: isis-dev@in=
cubator.apache.org=0A> >>>>>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011,=0A> 7:43 AM=0A>=
 >>>>>>> This vote is now closed, and=0A> has=0A> >>>>>>> passed:=0A> >>>>>=
>>=0A> >>>>>>> 6 +1 votes (+3 from members).=0A> >>>>>>> No 0 votes=0A> >>>=
>>>> No -1 votes.=0A> >>>>>>>=0A> >>>>>>> I am now going to cut the=0A> fin=
al=0A> >> release=0A> >>>> (0.1.2-incubating)=0A> >>>>>>> from the same rev=
ision, and=0A> will=0A> >> request a=0A> >>>> lazy consensus=0A> >>>>>>> vo=
te on general@incubator.a.o=0A> >>>>>>> for the final release.=0A> >>>>>>>=
=0A> >>>>>>> Thanks, all=0A> >>>>>>> Dan=0A> >>>>>>>=0A> >>>>>>>=0A> >>>>>>=
>=0A>