incubator-isis-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:11:56 GMT
Hi Dan!

Yes, please go on rolling a new 'final' release now ;)

As Benson explained already, there is usually no need to do -rc stuff upfront since we use
staging repos (which we can drop if the content is not perfect).

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood <dkhaywood@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dan Haywood <dkhaywood@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 12:31 PM
> OK... so I'll now push out a final
> release to vote on again (because I 
> presume we don't want our first release to have an RC
> postfix).
> 
> This will be the same content, but just with the POM
> versions updated.  
> Details in the next vote thread.
> 
> Dan
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > Hi Dan!
> >
> > I've seen you did some tagging, branching _after_ we
> voted. I know this is kind of nit picking but we must ship
> _exactly_ the source binary we've voted on! No single bit
> change is allowed, that must have the exact same sha1!
> >
> > Of course, we can do a release without the -RCx
> postfix, but we would then need to re-do the vote again.
> >
> > I know this sounds ridiculous in the first moment, but
> if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that nothing
> important got changed?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release
> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
> >> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 10:55 AM
> >> Nour,
> >> will do...
> >>
> >> can I ask though that you please don't post to general@incubator.a.o,
> >>
> >> because I would like to.  (I want to explain
> how the
> >> release I would
> >> like the vote on general relates to the release
> candidate
> >> that was voted
> >> on in isis-dev).
> >>
> >> Thx
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20/06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> >>> +1 @Mark
> >>>
> >>> Would you please do it Dan so I announce the
> [VOTE]
> >> pass on general@
> >>> and then we are ready to [VOTE] on there.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Mark
> Struberg<struberg@yahoo.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Dan!
> >>>>
> >>>> It's usus to explicitly list the names
> (or
> >> apacheids) of those who voted. Just to make it a
> bit easier
> >> to control. Could you please add those?
> >>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>> strub
> >>>>
> >>>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> From: Dan Haywood<dkhaywood@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis
> release
> >> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
> >>>>> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 7:43 AM
> >>>>> This vote is now closed, and has
> >>>>> passed:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 6 +1 votes (+3 from members).
> >>>>> No 0 votes
> >>>>> No -1 votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am now going to cut the final
> release
> >> (0.1.2-incubating)
> >>>>> from the same revision, and will
> request a
> >> lazy consensus
> >>>>> vote on general@incubator.a.o
> >>>>> for the final release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks, all
> >>>>> Dan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> 

Mime
View raw message