Mailing-List: contact isis-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of the.malkolm@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=oC43qEX+HS+tGk++I1Ds5uoE9w6oSZzeGlt4NyZbIcoOD+k8oGAkSMH+1g1ACDbVEw
         j/NVd6+zP7dOjSBse7wTcv23OD+fngVmstf1OvEnK/3nOsmPOOF6GEcAhWb0aYzkAaWW
         sAgi2A2E+EVlBQXiD6cxKyd33qjb38RdVR0EU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1ED48C5E-7476-4F1F-B76A-75C1A3308413@mycosystems.co.uk>
References: <4CD87F1D.7080605@gmail.com>
 <1ED48C5E-7476-4F1F-B76A-75C1A3308413@mycosystems.co.uk>
From: Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:12:49 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTim-GeGaqL2R+nk4r_2fPVr-5jayGFMMnHbT00FZ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regular Skype conf. calls?
To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630ff8f7a72ae049492c4c2

--00163630ff8f7a72ae049492c4c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

My 5 cent. Video conference isn't available for Linux too.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Burton <mikeb@mycosystems.co.uk>wrote:

> Good idea but seems it's not yet available for Mac which would be a
> limitation for some of us. Well worth keeping an eye on though. Meanwhile
> perhaps a regular /voice/ conf call?
>
> Mike Burton
>
>
> On 8 Nov 2010, at 22:52, Dan Haywood <dkhaywood@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There's been a few off-list conversations (between Nour, Siegfried and
> myself, at least) about having regular virtual get togethers on Skype.  Now
> that Skype [1] has group video conferencing, I think this would be a good
> way to help the community develop.
> >
> > Questions:
> > 1. do we think it'd be good idea?  and if so...
> > 2. how often ought we to do this?
> > 3. what time of the day ought we to have the call?
> >
> > Obviously we couldn't realistically expect everyone to attend every call,
> but we could perhaps have a system whereby someone volunteers to be the
> host, ie they will definitely be on the call, and anyone else is optional
> (perhaps a wiki sign-on sheet to indicate attendance).
> >
> > Thoughts?  Have any of the mentors done this on other projects, and to
> what success/lack of?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > [1]
> http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/features/allfeatures/group-video-calls/
> >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Alexander

--00163630ff8f7a72ae049492c4c2--