Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-isis-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26566 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 22:52:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 22:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 45975 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 22:52:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-isis-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45946 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 22:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact isis-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45937 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 22:52:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:52:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dkhaywood@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:52:34 +0000 Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so238396wwb.0 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:52:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; bh=OFJzFEdtjXftG0lGnfmUcjVxApl9L0OERGF7r3OAQ8Q=; b=bTx0Ox9HdzZ74PGZtQh0+ANkS1UOO1fYoNMWPbFE0u8cpGDqN34jezpWlK+QwxDPlV i14SE9mIr9GHrSqjsWryHT4oWmaAFB72ABBBonLZmoYUYHxOo2V/rNYD+RbaO8dBekTm nWLb3ymDeq64cwD5wgZixkAulLitLwEYkQepQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:subject:content-type; b=eerGukI4LYv0/5Iw4J+jEruedlr+kXqc1ZWRD/9zuKMvwnyhjrt8wXyjWooQWbhJLh eHZ44LTSn/jIp0tusj0L9afENxjeGrE4t3Bzcq91IzDwO6o8jLr0XOQ4T39DKBcnBQkU BknbWdo8sDQNykw+7C4HPeZz8KRMh5jqtsM6Y= Received: by 10.227.154.204 with SMTP id p12mr5934330wbw.217.1289256731934; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.171.3.238] ([217.41.233.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f14sm391737wbe.2.2010.11.08.14.52.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:52:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD87F1D.7080605@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:52:13 +0000 From: Dan Haywood Reply-To: dan@haywood-associates.co.uk Organization: Haywood Associates Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Regular Skype conf. calls? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020405000503020607050501" --------------020405000503020607050501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There's been a few off-list conversations (between Nour, Siegfried and myself, at least) about having regular virtual get togethers on Skype. Now that Skype [1] has group video conferencing, I think this would be a good way to help the community develop. Questions: 1. do we think it'd be good idea? and if so... 2. how often ought we to do this? 3. what time of the day ought we to have the call? Obviously we couldn't realistically expect everyone to attend every call, but we could perhaps have a system whereby someone volunteers to be the host, ie they will definitely be on the call, and anyone else is optional (perhaps a wiki sign-on sheet to indicate attendance). Thoughts? Have any of the mentors done this on other projects, and to what success/lack of? Dan [1] http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/features/allfeatures/group-video-calls/ --------------020405000503020607050501--