incubator-imperius-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Neeraj Joshi <jnee...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: test cases
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:39:31 GMT
Hey All,
Sorry for my ignorance I wasn't aware that this is highly discouraged! 
I'll stick to posting on the list.
Thanks
Neeraj
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others." 

http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
 
Neeraj Joshi
Autonomic Computing Policy Development
Tivoli, IBM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Filip at Apache <fhanik@apache.org> 
01/10/2008 11:45 AM
Please respond to
imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org


To
imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: test cases






Neeraj Joshi wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> So the sample policies were designed as test cases to test the major 
> features of SPL.
> That was one of the reasons why they were part of the JavaSPL module 
> initially (shipping them as samples was an after thought).
>  We have a couple of 'ComputerSystem' related polices those are more 
like 
> samples (and there are no junit tests associated with them)
>
> I agree that pure unit tests that don't require visual inspection would 
be 
> ideal but IMO its a non-trivial task. If you like we can setup 
conference
> calls to discuss this in more detail?
> 
you don't wanna do that, not good for the community. even IRC is 
questionable, but more acceptable as you can post the log here.
the thing with both calls and IRC, you can't make any decisions (none 
that are valid), so what ever you discuss, you need to bring back here, 
if there needs to be a decision made
try to do as much as you can over the mailing lists

Filip
> Thanks
> Neeraj
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others." 
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/imperius
> 
> Neeraj Joshi
> Autonomic Computing Policy Development
> Tivoli, IBM
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> "Erik Bengtson" <erik@jpox.org> 
> 01/09/2008 03:25 PM
> Please respond to
> imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
> <imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> test cases
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm promised to provide some test cases, but in the form the tests are 
> coded
> now, you can only recognize failures by visual means. Secondly, the 
tests
> are not appropriately structured. See:
>
> Splcore has main classes and unit tests. OK
> Javaspl has main classes. OK
> JavaSPL-Samples has sample policies and sample API usage. It also has 
unit
> tests, but these can only be validated visually.
>
> I propose moving the tests from JavaSPL-Samples to JavaSPL, since 
samples
> should only contain samples, and rewrite these tests using junit 
> assertions.
>
> I can patch those, but if beforehand you can review/apply the patches in
> JIRA it's great.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1214 - Release Date: 
1/8/2008 1:38 PM
> 



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message