incubator-heraldry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Granqvist, Hans" <hgranqv...@verisign.com>
Subject RE: Moving forward or moving out
Date Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:08:03 GMT
Has this been discussed: how about using http://labs.apache.org ?
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Recordon, David [mailto:drecordon@verisign.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 10:58 AM
> To: heraldry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Moving forward or moving out
> 
> So assuming there is enough other interest, I'd like to 
> continue participating.  I see this as participating on the 
> existing Ruby PIP codebase as needed via VeriSign, but I 
> personally really want to start a new ruby on rails OpenID 
> Provider.  I think a lot of lessons have been learned since 
> the rPIP was first written as well as RoR as a technology has 
> significantly advanced.
> 
> So my main interest would be finding a group of people 
> wanting to work on kick-ass Ruby OpenID libraries which can 
> be used in a new RoR OpenID Provider.  I'd love to know if 
> others, whether currently a committer or not, would have 
> interest in working on this here as well?
> 
> --David 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Leung [mailto:twleung@sauria.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:28 PM
> To: heraldry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving forward or moving out
> 
> Ok,
> 
> Here's how I'd like to handle this.  If you want to continue 
> to be a committer on Heraldry - which means that you actually 
> worked on the Ruby PIP (since that's the only code we have 
> left), then please reply  
> and indicate that, and your affiliation.    You must do this  
> yourself.  I will not be accepting a block submission of names for  
> the new committer list.   If you can't be bothered to send this e- 
> mail yourself, then you won't like the amount of work that it 
> is going to take to get Heraldry going.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ted
> 
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> 
> > The Incubator PMC has been discussing Heraldry.  We need to make it 
> > clear that there is only one set of rules that will be 
> tolerated here,
> 
> > and those are ours.  Anyone who is willing to abide by them is 
> > enthusiasticaly welcomed to participate.  But anyone who 
> isn't willing
> 
> > to abide by our basic rules for open, collaborative, development 
> > cannot be permitted to trade on the ASF's good name.
> >
> > The Mentors are asked to submit a new Committer list and suggested 
> > PPMC consisting of anyone who is prepared to operating under our 
> > rules, and expresses that interest.  If such a list cannot be 
> > produced, we're prepared to close the project.  But we do hope that 
> > there are sufficient people interested and willing to work on this 
> > project in an open and collaborative manner.
> >
> > We would like this list by March 19, at which point we will either 
> > replace the commit ACL or remove it.
> >
> > The revised group will be charged with reviewing the 
> Heraldry charter
> > -- the remaining scope of the project will need to be 
> reevaluated in 
> > light of the changes -- and resubmitting that plan to the Incubator 
> > PMC for review.
> >
> > 	--- Noel
> >
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message