incubator-heraldry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gav...." <brightoncomput...@brightontown.com.au>
Subject RE: Moving forward or moving out
Date Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:56:48 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Recordon, David [mailto:drecordon@verisign.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2007 2:58 AM
> To: heraldry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Moving forward or moving out
> 
> So assuming there is enough other interest, I'd like to continue
> participating.  I see this as participating on the existing Ruby PIP
> codebase as needed via VeriSign, but I personally really want to start a
> new ruby on rails OpenID Provider.  I think a lot of lessons have been
> learned since the rPIP was first written as well as RoR as a technology
> has significantly advanced.
> 
> So my main interest would be finding a group of people wanting to work
> on kick-ass Ruby OpenID libraries which can be used in a new RoR OpenID
> Provider.  I'd love to know if others, whether currently a committer or
> not, would have interest in working on this here as well?

Well, if you need any help with a website and docs ..

i.e you don't have one here at Apache yet 

http://incubator.apache.org/heraldry/

then I'll help with that. As for the code I'm not up on it so probably
not for a while, but you need a whole community here, not just code gurus.

Gav...

> 
> --David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Leung [mailto:twleung@sauria.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:28 PM
> To: heraldry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving forward or moving out
> 
> Ok,
> 
> Here's how I'd like to handle this.  If you want to continue to be a
> committer on Heraldry - which means that you actually worked on the Ruby
> PIP (since that's the only code we have left), then please reply
> and indicate that, and your affiliation.    You must do this
> yourself.  I will not be accepting a block submission of names for
> the new committer list.   If you can't be bothered to send this e-
> mail yourself, then you won't like the amount of work that it is going
> to take to get Heraldry going.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ted
> 
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> 
> > The Incubator PMC has been discussing Heraldry.  We need to make it
> > clear that there is only one set of rules that will be tolerated here,
> 
> > and those are ours.  Anyone who is willing to abide by them is
> > enthusiasticaly welcomed to participate.  But anyone who isn't willing
> 
> > to abide by our basic rules for open, collaborative, development
> > cannot be permitted to trade on the ASF's good name.
> >
> > The Mentors are asked to submit a new Committer list and suggested
> > PPMC consisting of anyone who is prepared to operating under our
> > rules, and expresses that interest.  If such a list cannot be
> > produced, we're prepared to close the project.  But we do hope that
> > there are sufficient people interested and willing to work on this
> > project in an open and collaborative manner.
> >
> > We would like this list by March 19, at which point we will either
> > replace the commit ACL or remove it.
> >
> > The revised group will be charged with reviewing the Heraldry charter
> > -- the remaining scope of the project will need to be reevaluated in
> > light of the changes -- and resubmitting that plan to the Incubator
> > PMC for review.
> >
> > 	--- Noel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.11/722 - Release Date: 3/14/2007
> 3:38 PM


Mime
View raw message