incubator-hcatalog-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Drome <cdr...@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.5.0-incubating (candidate 2)
Date Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:35:27 GMT
I posted a comment to 601 which explains how we worked around the
dependency issues for our CI builds.

Although I'm not sure if this is a practical solution in general.

chris


On 1/29/13 9:49 AM, "Travis Crawford" <traviscrawford@gmail.com> wrote:

>Sounds good - we'll wrap up HCATALOG-601 and I'll post an updated
>release candiate.
>
>--travis
>
>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> At this point I'm +1 to bumping the dependency too.  Originally I
>>didn't want to because we'd have to go back through all the testing.
>>But we could have done all the testing 3 times over by now, and we still
>>don't know how to solve this maven issue.  I say we bump it and I'll
>>rerun the tests on the rc.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Travis Crawford wrote:
>>
>>> Just read your comments - thanks for so thoroughly looking into this.
>>>
>>> Re: bumping the jersey dependency, that's not a library I have much
>>> experience with, nor have I been using webhcat during the dev cycle to
>>> have a good way of testing with a prod workload. I'll defer to others
>>> on this one.
>>>
>>> That said - this is a new feature that presumably no one depends on
>>> yet, so I think we can be more aggressive than with an hcatalog-core
>>> dep, which people do already depend on.
>>>
>>> To move forward, I think we need to gauge our comfort level bumping
>>> this dependency, then decide if we want to bump or put a workaround in
>>> place.
>>>
>>> --travis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> Hi Travis,
>>>>
>>>> I'm still having glassfish related issues building this on a fresh
>>>> checkout and no pre-existing ~/.m2 . I made a few new comments on
>>>> HCATALOG-601. Could you please take a look?
>>>>
>>>> I'm now actually proposing bumping our jersey dependency to 1.14 for
>>>> both 0.5 and trunk.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Sushanth
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Travis Crawford
>>>> <traviscrawford@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created a candidate build for HCatalog 0.5.0-incubating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>>>>> 
>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/hcatalog/trunk/KEYS?view=markup
>>>>>
>>>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~travis/hcatalog-0.5.0-incubating-candidate-2
>>>>>/
>>>>>
>>>>> The release, md5 signature, gpg signature, and rat report can all be
>>>>> found at the above address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Tuesday, January 29.
>>>>>
>>>>> CHANGES SINCE RC1:
>>>>>
>>>>> HCATALOG-604 add flexibility wrt. location of PID/LOG files
>>>>> HCATALOG-608 exclude data files from hcatalog release audit report
>>>>> HCATALOG-606 remove hcatalog test includes/excludes files
>>>>> HCATALOG-599 NotificationListener doesn't use getTopic() for sending
>>>>>messages.
>>>>>
>>>>> --travis
>>


Mime
View raw message