incubator-hcatalog-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giridharan Kesavan <gkesa...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating (candidate 0)
Date Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:55:03 GMT
Alan,

If you planning for a new RC, could you pls include
"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HCATALOG-267" ?

-Giri



On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM, David Capwell <dcapwell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we also get the release in maven?  HCATALOG-132 would make it easier
> for people to use hcat and integrate against hcat.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Francis Liu <toffer@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Alan, if you're rerolling a new candidate. Can we update the release notes
>> about HBaseHCatStorageHandler?
>>
>> -Francis
>>
>> On 3/20/12 5:42 PM, "Alan Gates" <gates@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> >If it won't build for people I need to reroll it.  HCATALOG-266 which
>> >addresses this has already been checked into the branch.  I'll roll
>> >forward to this fix and build a new release candidate.
>> >
>> >Alan.
>> >
>> >On Mar 20, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Travis Crawford wrote:
>> >
>> >> I ran into the same issue as Sushanth, failing trying to
>> >> resolve hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT. Maybe remove "jar-storage-handlers" as a
>> >> dependency of the "jar" target? This will likely not build for most
>> >>users
>> >> since they won't have snapshot jars available.
>> >>
>> >> For anyone who was able to build this - if you trash that jar from your
>> >> local ivy/maven repos can you still build?
>> >>
>> >> --travis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan
>> >><khorgath@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> In a fresh dev environment of mine, ant fails from a maven dependency
>> >>> check for hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT ( linked to in
>> >>> storage-handlers/hbase/ivy/libraries.properties ).
>> >>>
>> >>> The work around for this is to simply build with a
>> >>>-Dhbase.version=0.92.1 .
>> >>>
>> >>> I realise that the hbase storage handler is still under development
so
>> >>> I don't necessarily see this as a reason to reroll the package, but
>> >>> wanted to note this. What do others think?
>> >>>
>> >>> Other than that note, tests succeed, md5 works, rpm package builds and
>> >>> installs and checks on the server work. +1 from me.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Sushanth
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan
>> >>><hashutosh@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> +1 md5checksum matches. Builds fine. Ran unit tests.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Release notes mention at the top "TThese notes are for HCatalog
0.2.0
>> >>>> release." This should be 0.4.0 release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Ashutosh
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:41, Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com>
>> >>>>wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I have created a candidate build for HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating.
>> >>>>>  Keys
>> >>> used
>> >>>>> to sign the release are available from the KEYS file in HCatalog's
>> >>>>>SVN.
>> >>>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>>
>> >>>>> >>>>>http://people.apache.org/~gates/hcatalog-0.4.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The release, md5 signature, gpg signature, release notes, and
rat
>> >>>>>report
>> >>>>> can all be found at the above address.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Wednesday, March 21st.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Alan.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message