Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of edwardyoon@apache.org designates
 10.68.227.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.227.99;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJ-=ys=gkEf1+J=-A_sQrL_bvXNxNaaO0WV6Cs7xoRHQP+T+qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGQgZQSEAPAXB3=7df1O-Q3RBrOKivAoA0GGQNzN+oMJnjrdpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-=ys=ECshpwf0fVaRub_puLqmH3gk6oG5=Vzy4k8PHK2zR9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGQgZQR9tJvvOPVPj69-d1NrGHeKvy78m4kV_YBpZeTfxzS7vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-=ys=gkEf1+J=-A_sQrL_bvXNxNaaO0WV6Cs7xoRHQP+T+qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:14:28 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQgZQTT54aWF6urbP_QeJ+28B9iD0N_+px59XoV-z=ewnbPtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting a release 0.5-incubating
From: "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If it takes 5 ~ 6 months[1], then we can release 0.5 in the autumn or
winter of this year.

I'm not talking about Incubator Graduation. I think the harmony with
our surroundings and environment is important. Someone want to use
Graph APIs, other people want to use with Hadoop 0.20.205, In my case
I want to use Hama on Clouds, and Whirr/Bigtop teams are go faster
than us.

1. http://markmail.org/message/ziviktlm7yjihvew

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Jukka told us recently that there is no technical requirement for
> graduation.
> However, the attention we get should be well used.
> We should target people that use Hama in production use and they really
> need some fault tolerance. (I plan it to use as well once we upgraded to
> YARN).
>
> Based on the new features we implemented in this few weeks, we could slic=
e
> a new release yes.
> But I don't see fault tolerance (at least checkpoint recovery) as a new
> feature rather than a must-have improvement.
>
> We have delayed the fault tolerance for now 2 releases, why delay it
> further?
>
> Am 6. M=C3=A4rz 2012 08:56 schrieb Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>=
:
>
>> Agree.
>>
>> Sorry for my short mail, I was mean about new features. I think, we've
>> added enough new features (MSG Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API
>> package).
>>
>> Should we must add checkpoint recovery to 0.5 road-map?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hy,
>> >
>> > we haven't released 0.4.0 at all yet, so why don't we wait for bug
>> reports
>> > or feedback?
>> >
>> > Am 6. M=C3=A4rz 2012 01:14 schrieb Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.o=
rg>:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> What do you think about cutting a release 0.5-incubating with MSG
>> >> Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API package new features and Support
>> >> Hadoop 1.0?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >> @eddieyoon
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> > Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>


--=20
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon