Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of edwardyoon@apache.org designates
 10.68.226.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.226.231;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CB6EFE63.C88F%mfranklin@mitre.org>
References: 
 <CAGQgZQQu_5or4HCtNQ5mSoPgoRrQ_-uWioFCgCDw9zBUuLw8mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CB6EFE63.C88F%mfranklin@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:21:41 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQgZQSJX-VXWWcGP-0We0PCBDkVdsZC5M+0uQXXt+971mKRjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
From: "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
To: general@incubator.apache.org, mfranklin@mitre.org
Cc: "hama-dev@incubator.apache.org" <hama-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Added also bloom filter license in described Hadoop LICENSE file.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt

Is this now complete, Franklin?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
<mfranklin@mitre.org> wrote:
> On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues
>>related with packaging web resources e.g.,
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494
>>
>>If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release.
>
> As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release=
;
> which your combined one does. =C2=A0As I said it isn't optimal.
>
> The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I
> mentioned earlier.
>
>>
>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
>><mfranklin@mitre.org> wrote:
>>> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release
>>>is
>>> preferred [1]. =C2=A0This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but somethin=
g that
>>> you should look at.
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>>
>>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-=
t
>>>yp
>>> es
>>>
>>> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd
>>>>>>party
>>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> your release. =C2=A0Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (a=
nd
>>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>>>>which I
>>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>>>>
>>>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt
>>>>file contains the Apache license v2.0.
>>>>
>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt
>>>>
>>>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it
>>>>again?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ant itself includes code under a separate license. =C2=A0Since your bin=
ary
>>> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need
>>>to
>>> include its license.
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files=
.
>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>>>>trunk to
>>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>>>>
>>>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not
>>>>tested enough yet.
>>>>
>>>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>>>><thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0
>>>>>license. If
>>>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until
>>>>>the
>>>>> overnext year.
>>>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>>>>trunk to
>>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@mitre.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns
>>>>>>noted
>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This
>>>>>>fixes
>>>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Signing KEYS:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resourc=
e
>>>>>>s/
>>>>>>fi
>>>>>> >les/KEYS
>>>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own
>>>>>>public
>>>>>> html folder, but this is not required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/
>>>>>> >NOTICE.txt:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.t=
x
>>>>>>>t
>>>>>> >LICENSE.txt:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.=
t
>>>>>>>xt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd
>>>>>>party
>>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> your release. =C2=A0Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (a=
nd
>>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>>>>which I
>>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license
>>>>>> >headers.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 1=
6
>>>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Thanks.
>>>>>> >--
>>>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>>> >@eddieyoon
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>>>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Jungblut
>>>>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>@eddieyoon
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>@eddieyoon
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


--=20
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon