incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop 1.0.0 and 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT
Date Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:46:34 GMT
You already heard it on commons-dev. There is nothin in the repository.
However, when slicing the release, you could download the real release and
manually put it into the lib folder.

We can also wait with releasing YARN.. We should look at
HAMA-452<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-452> first,
afterwards we can release it - in my opinion as ALPHA.


2012/2/1 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>

> BTW, should we release yarn with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
> >> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
> >> of Hadoop 1.0.
> >> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
> >> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
> >
> >
> > Yes, this sounds reasonable.
> >
> > 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks
> >> safer for us in maintenance.
> >>
> >> On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
> >> >
> >> > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
> >> > of Hadoop 1.0.
> >> >
> >> > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
> >> > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> >> > <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes.
> >> >>
> >> >> There is
> >> >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0.
> >> >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as
> >> well.
> >> >> But we have to test this.
> >> >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not
> >> run
> >> >> on this as well.
> >> >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work.
> >> >> - 23.0 we have YARN.
> >> >>
> >> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases.
> >> Better
> >> >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22.
> >> >>
> >> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release,
> >> which
> >> >> is  *0.20.203. *
> >> >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases.
On
> >> the
> >> >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps
> >> >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2)
> >> >>> would be a bit easier for us.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut
> >> >>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop
> >> versions?
> >> >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > What should we do with yarn?
> >> >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can
try it
> out.
> >> >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work
is
> stable.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>:
> >> >>> >> +1
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and
switch the
> >> trunk
> >> >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon <
> >> edwardyoon@apache.org>
> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>> > Hi all,
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use
hadoop 1.0.0?
> and
> >> >>> should
> >> >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >> >>> >>> >
> >> >>> >>> > --
> >> >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> >>> >>> > @eddieyoon
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> --
> >> >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> >>> >>> @eddieyoon
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Thomas Jungblut
> >> >>> > Berlin
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Thomas Jungblut
> >> >> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> > @eddieyoon
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Jungblut
> > Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message