incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Hadoop 1.0.0 and 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT
Date Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:24:00 GMT
I just noticed that there's a 'allowTimestampedSnapshots' in release-plugin.

But, I prefer delay, it's more stable.

What do you think about excluding yarn-version from 0.4.0-incubating release?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> You already heard it on commons-dev. There is nothin in the repository.
> However, when slicing the release, you could download the real release and
> manually put it into the lib folder.
>
> We can also wait with releasing YARN.. We should look at
> HAMA-452<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-452> first,
> afterwards we can release it - in my opinion as ALPHA.
>
>
> 2012/2/1 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>
>> BTW, should we release yarn with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
>> >> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
>> >> of Hadoop 1.0.
>> >> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
>> >> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, this sounds reasonable.
>> >
>> > 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
>> >
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks
>> >> safer for us in maintenance.
>> >>
>> >> On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
>> >> >
>> >> > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
>> >> > of Hadoop 1.0.
>> >> >
>> >> > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
>> >> > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> >> > <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There is
>> >> >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0.
>> >> >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0
as
>> >> well.
>> >> >> But we have to test this.
>> >> >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may
not
>> >> run
>> >> >> on this as well.
>> >> >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work.
>> >> >> - 23.0 we have YARN.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases.
>> >> Better
>> >> >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release,
>> >> which
>> >> >> is  *0.20.203. *
>> >> >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases.
On
>> >> the
>> >> >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps
>> >> >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2)
>> >> >>> would be a bit easier for us.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut
>> >> >>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different
Hadoop
>> >> versions?
>> >> >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > What should we do with yarn?
>> >> >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people
can try it
>> out.
>> >> >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my
work is
>> stable.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>> >> +1
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2
and switch the
>> >> trunk
>> >> >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon
<
>> >> edwardyoon@apache.org>
>> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>> > Hi all,
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we
use hadoop 1.0.0?
>> and
>> >> >>> should
>> >> >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
>> >> >>> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>> > --
>> >> >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >> >>> >>> > @eddieyoon
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> --
>> >> >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >> >>> >>> @eddieyoon
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > --
>> >> >>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> >> >>> > Berlin
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Thomas Jungblut
>> >> >> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >> > @eddieyoon
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> > Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message