incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Franklin, Matthew B." <mfrank...@mitre.org>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Date Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:52:33 GMT
I most likely won't have time to look at this until tomorrow.  So long as you have gone through
all of your bundled dependencies and checked their licenses for source inclusions, then you
will be OK.

-Matt

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Edward J. Yoon [mailto:edwardyoon@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 5:22 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org; Franklin, Matthew B.
>Cc: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
>
>Added also bloom filter license in described Hadoop LICENSE file.
>
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt
>
>Is this now complete, Franklin?
>
>On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
><mfranklin@mitre.org> wrote:
>> On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues
>>>related with packaging web resources e.g.,
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494
>>>
>>>If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release.
>>
>> As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release;
>> which your combined one does.  As I said it isn't optimal.
>>
>> The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I
>> mentioned earlier.
>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
>>><mfranklin@mitre.org> wrote:
>>>> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release
>>>>is
>>>> preferred [1].  This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that
>>>> you should look at.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>>
>>>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-
>practice-t
>>>>yp
>>>> es
>>>>
>>>> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include
3rd
>>>>>>>party
>>>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as
part
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>> your release.  Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7
(and
>>>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>>>>>which I
>>>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>>>>>
>>>>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt
>>>>>file contains the Apache license v2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-
>RC6/LICENSE.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it
>>>>>again?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ant itself includes code under a separate license.  Since your binary
>>>> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need
>>>>to
>>>> include its license.
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>>>>>trunk to
>>>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not
>>>>>tested enough yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>>>>><thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0
>>>>>>license. If
>>>>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> overnext year.
>>>>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from
>>>>>>trunk to
>>>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@mitre.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns
>>>>>>>noted
>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Hi,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release.
This
>>>>>>>fixes
>>>>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Signing KEYS:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/reso
>urce
>>>>>>>s/
>>>>>>>fi
>>>>>>> >les/KEYS
>>>>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the
SVN?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own
>>>>>>>public
>>>>>>> html folder, but this is not required.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-
>RC6/
>>>>>>> >NOTICE.txt:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-
>RC6/NOTICE.tx
>>>>>>>>t
>>>>>>> >LICENSE.txt:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-
>RC6/LICENSE.t
>>>>>>>>xt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include
3rd
>>>>>>>party
>>>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as
part
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>> your release.  Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7
(and
>>>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses
>>>>>>>which I
>>>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for
>license
>>>>>>> >headers.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode
on my 16
>>>>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Thanks.
>>>>>>> >--
>>>>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>>>> >@eddieyoon
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-
>help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thomas Jungblut
>>>>>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>>@eddieyoon
>>>>>
>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>@eddieyoon
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>@eddieyoon
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Mime
View raw message