incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop 1.0.0 and 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT
Date Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:56:28 GMT
Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes.

There is
- 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0.
- 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as well.
But we have to test this.
- 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not run
on this as well.
- 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work.
- 23.0 we have YARN.

We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. Better
would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22.

In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, which
is  *0.20.203. *
And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On the
common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0.

2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>

> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps
> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2)
> would be a bit easier for us.
>
> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut
> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop versions?
> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0.
> >
> > What should we do with yarn?
> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it out.
> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable.
> >
> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> >>
> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the trunk
> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >
> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0? and
> should
> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >>> > @eddieyoon
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >>> @eddieyoon
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Jungblut
> > Berlin
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message