incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chia-Hung Lin <cli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop 1.0.0 and 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:18:40 GMT
+1

And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks
safer for us in maintenance.

On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
>
> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
> of Hadoop 1.0.
>
> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes.
>>
>> There is
>> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0.
>> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as well.
>> But we have to test this.
>> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not run
>> on this as well.
>> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work.
>> - 23.0 we have YARN.
>>
>> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases. Better
>> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22.
>>
>> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release, which
>> is  *0.20.203. *
>> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On the
>> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0.
>>
>> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
>>
>>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps
>>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2)
>>> would be a bit easier for us.
>>>
>>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut
>>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop versions?
>>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0.
>>> >
>>> > What should we do with yarn?
>>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it out.
>>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable.
>>> >
>>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch the trunk
>>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> > Hi all,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop 1.0.0?
and
>>> should
>>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > --
>>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> >>> > @eddieyoon
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> >>> @eddieyoon
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Thomas Jungblut
>>> > Berlin
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Jungblut
>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message