incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Awesome bench results after removing Thread.sleep in sync() method.
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:12:42 GMT
That is great. I think we can push this under 200s.
I attach a profiler and send you a list of hotspots.

lg.

2011/9/22 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>

> By ChiaHung's HAMA-387.patch, hang problem is fixed.
>
> And also, on same environment (1 rack, 256 cores), a bench example
> result is dramatically improved. (184.076 seconds from 307.129
> seconds)
>
> ----
> # core/bin/hama jar
> examples/target/hama-examples-0.4.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar bench 16
> 1000 512
> ..
> 11/09/22 10:27:32 INFO bsp.BSPJobClient: Current supersteps number: 504
> 11/09/22 10:27:35 INFO bsp.BSPJobClient: Current supersteps number: 508
> 11/09/22 10:27:38 INFO bsp.BSPJobClient: Current supersteps number: 512
> 11/09/22 10:27:38 INFO bsp.BSPJobClient: The total number of supersteps:
> 512
> Job Finished in 184.076 seconds
>
> Hama 0.4 (r.1163903) was:
>
> 16 bytes | 1000 | 512 | 307.129 seconds
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin

mobile: 0170-3081070

business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message