Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B42A78E3 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13936 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 13:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13899 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 13:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13891 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2011 13:41:10 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:41:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username edwardyoon, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:41:09 +0000 Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so712208yxi.6 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:41:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.134.2 with SMTP id j2mr992497ict.67.1313588468646; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.13.71 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:41:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:41:08 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012 > (IMO). I think so. > And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this > isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful. Our goal is clear. IMO, we should focus on easy-to-use system in the short-term. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Jungblut wrote: > Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward? > After that Whirr stuff I'll take care of HAMA-409, it would be great if > Miklos is going to help me a bit if he has time :) > We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012 > (IMO). > > And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this > isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful. > > 2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon > >> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily >> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system, >> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc. >> >> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it. >> >> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going? >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> wrote: >> > Hey guys, >> > >> > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which >> order. >> > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts. >> > >> > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee: >> > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward) >> > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me) >> > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199 >> > >> > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release? >> > >> > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+ >> > committers, 3+ PPMC members". >> > >> > Where do you see us in 3-4 months? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Thomas >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> > > > > -- > Thomas Jungblut > Berlin > > mobile: 0170-3081070 > > business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de > private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon