incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:31:08 GMT
> What's the current state of HAMA-410?

Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
potential problems.

2011/8/17 Miklós Erdélyi <erdelyim@gmail.com>:
> For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code
> fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> reading graphs.
> After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> separate package.
>
> What's the current state of HAMA-410?
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
>> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
>> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>>
>> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>>
>> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
>>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>>>
>>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
>>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
>>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
>>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>>>
>>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>>>
>>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
>>> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>>>
>>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message