incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Rearrange our roadmap
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:58:41 GMT
As far as I can recall, there was no conclusion.

http://www.mail-archive.com/hama-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg03742.html

and "ϕ accrual failure detector" also.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:46 AM, ChiaHung Lin <chl501@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
> I remember there was discussion that Hama would not adapt to MR-279. Is this still the
case?
>
> -----Original message-----
> From:Steve Loughran <stevel@apache.org>
> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date:Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:15:14 +0100
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Rearrange our roadmap
>
> On 06/08/2011 06:22 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would suggest that we have to focus on performance improvements and
>> basic communication parts of BSP framework. So I've little edited our
>> roadmap page.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/hama/RoadMap
>>
>> If you have any comments or other opinions, let's discuss here.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I'd recommend targeting running the fault tolerant code under the MR-279
> engine (hadoop 0.22 or .23?), as this will deploy more than just the MR
> engine, and handle liveness -so you don't need to replicate core modules.
>
> the big thing for BSP engines is checkpointing, where the sync point
> becomes the thing you can checkpoint.
>
>
> --
> ChiaHung Lin
> Department of Information Management
> National University of Kaohsiung
> Taiwan
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message