incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Jungblut (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-358) Evaluation of Hama BSP communication protocol performance
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:39:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050779#comment-13050779
] 

Thomas Jungblut commented on HAMA-358:
--------------------------------------

Yap, I had an older index application that runs on a server, wanted to replace RMI with this.
But I gave up after two hours, it seems to be written for python primarily.
No :) Was just interested in what your results might be.

> Evaluation of Hama BSP communication protocol performance
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-358
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-358
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp, documentation 
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
>            Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
>             Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 1,008h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1,008h
>
> The goal of this project is performance evaluation of RPC frameworks (e.g., Hadoop RPC,
Thrift, Google Protobuf, ..., etc) to figure out which is the best solution for Hama BSP communication.
Currently Hama is using Hadoop RPC to communicate and transfer messages between BSP workers.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message