Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA0065E69 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19974 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:47:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19947 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19939 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 16:47:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:47:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:47:37 +0000 Received: by vxd7 with SMTP id 7so1474623vxd.6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JFBv5wN/HB+6MeNDQGzsBH88BzvoBTBbZsccLBwaEsQ=; b=jQgDYCeeDxOU4wJvVeEg4LxbYil/KtqZcz0OnRZpH/HTCW+vIWjBptxWj+NgFGV55f mqM/Lq/NOrOKWJqtUCbG7EuOHeIWq1pz44y1NzUo4Q2it2mFaVYuAAKf4DXMHgrhcmg2 w/puYP4qYGogair1FzFLdSVMCaWoNiNoW5p9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=o7B79JpTowu+sUuCWMRlQ8zAaRjA9GDpvASdihzvRGr3o2mFPUMIZKgojwOWyhYkEg JxxHOoG1aGM0JBB7UZRl8gLfRr5lJNhBYA9rCWGRrcETzxt2NA6KIzyUbNnU6uQNS3SH U++ZQqgi0tYNojeUdlq+9N1T8W7E2ONAA6WBY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.99.9 with SMTP id em9mr624536vdb.100.1305218835873; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.187.194 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22E4A5AB-8EE1-4C82-808E-392E0D19C63B@apache.org> References: <222839.74410.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <22E4A5AB-8EE1-4C82-808E-392E0D19C63B@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:47:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running mutiple tasks in local mode From: Thomas Jungblut To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: "chris.willmore@yahoo.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f3a4410fe2004a316f139 --20cf307f3a4410fe2004a316f139 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Actually I'm +1 with that, I wanted to implement this right from the start, but there were some issues why I didn't do that. In fact you can change the path, so the threadpoolsize wouldn't be a proble= m (I hope so :D). 2011/5/12 Edward J. Yoon > Hi all > > In LocalBSPRunner, Runtime.availableProcessor will retuns the num of > logical CPU's. Too small number. > > What do u think about increasing the num of threadPoolSize to ten times? > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Chris Willmore > > Date: 2011=B3=E2 5=BF=F9 10=C0=CF =BF=C0=C8=C4 6=BD=C3 32=BA=D0 51=C3= =CA KST > > To: "hama-user@incubator.apache.org" > > Subject: Running mutiple tasks in local mode > > Reply-To: hama-user@incubator.apache.org > > Reply-To: Chris Willmore > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I am playing around with the examples in local mode, but cannot figure > out how, or if it is even possible, to run more than 2 peers for a job. > > > > I'ved tried running: > > bin/hama jar hama-examples.jar pi > > > > with various values of num, but it seems it is disregarded and always 2 > are run (one master peer and one additional). > > Can I run and test locally with num > 2? > > > > Also, I was wondering how the number of peers concurrently running on a > given groom server are controlled. Is it configurable? > > > > Regards, > > Chris > --=20 Thomas Jungblut Berlin mobile: 0170-3081070 business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com --20cf307f3a4410fe2004a316f139--