incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Running mutiple tasks in local mode
Date Thu, 12 May 2011 16:47:15 GMT
Actually I'm +1 with that, I wanted to implement this right from the start,
but there were some issues why I didn't do that.
In fact you can change the path, so the threadpoolsize wouldn't be a problem
(I hope so :D).

2011/5/12 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>

> Hi all
>
> In LocalBSPRunner, Runtime.availableProcessor will retuns the num of
> logical CPU's. Too small number.
>
> What do u think about increasing the num of threadPoolSize to ten times?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Chris Willmore <chris.willmore@yahoo.com>
> > Date: 2011년 5월 10일 오후 6시 32분 51초 KST
> > To: "hama-user@incubator.apache.org" <hama-user@incubator.apache.org>
> > Subject: Running mutiple tasks in local mode
> > Reply-To: hama-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Reply-To: Chris Willmore <chris.willmore@yahoo.com>
> >
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am playing around with the examples in local mode, but cannot figure
> out how, or if it is even possible, to run more than 2 peers for a job.
> >
> > I'ved tried running:
> > bin/hama jar hama-examples.jar pi <num>
> >
> > with various values of num, but it seems it is disregarded and always 2
> are run (one master peer and one additional).
> > Can I run and test locally with num > 2?
> >
> > Also, I was wondering how the number of peers concurrently running on a
> given groom server are controlled. Is it configurable?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chris
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin

mobile: 0170-3081070

business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message