incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Assigned: (HAMA-283) Duplicate code regarding default configuration files for Hama
Date Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:21:17 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Edward J. Yoon reassigned HAMA-283:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Filipe Manana

> Duplicate code regarding default configuration files for Hama
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-283
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-283
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Filipe Manana
>            Assignee: Filipe Manana
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: HAMA-283.patch
>
>
> While doing my first Hama code walks, I noticed the exact same static block initializer
in the classes BSPMaster, GroomServer and BSPJobContext:
> static {
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-default.xml");
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-site.xml");
> }
> However, in the org.apache.hama.HamaConfiguration  class the constructor calls the following
method:
> private void addHamaResources() {
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-default.xml");
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-site.xml");
>   }
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this does exactly the same, right?
> With the following patch, which removes the static initializers, all the tests are passing.
> cheers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message