incubator-hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: About 0.19 branch and release
Date Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:11:52 GMT
Thanks for your opinion.

> I think we should do that, as BSP will change the entire architecture. My only suggestion
would be to have an architecture diagram as to how we would approach the BSP model.

Fortunately interfaces won't change. ;) Yes, we should organize our
plan on the wiki.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Vaijanath N. RAo <vaiju1981@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> I think we should do that, as BSP will change the entire architecture. My only suggestion
would be to have an architecture diagram as to how we would approach the BSP model.
>
> --Thanks and Regards
> Vaijanath N. Rao
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:05:26 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New
Delhi
> Subject: About 0.19 branch and release
>
> Hello all,
>
> IMO, Hama-0.19 (based on Hadoop/Hbase 0.19 and Map/Reduce) doesn't
> have a chance to improve functionality and performance. The
> pre-computation (e.g., blocking,..) is too heavy to avoid locality
> problem. So, I'd like to release it as a simple version and focus on
> new developments based on BSP model and Map/Reduce.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp.
> edwardyoon@apache.org
> http://blog.udanax.org
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp.
edwardyoon@apache.org
http://blog.udanax.org

Mime
View raw message