incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christophe Lombart" <christophe.lomb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Can jcr mapping be specified through bean fields without set/get methods ?
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:09:28 GMT
Sorry I didn't see your post on the jackrabbit mailing list.
This feature is not yet supported. You are welcome to create a new JIRA
issue (from Jackrabbit).

br,
Christophe


On 6/4/07, rajab57 <rajalakshmi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to do jcr mapping for a java class through the fields. I have
> some scenarios where
> I would like to expose only the getter and not allow it to be modified.
> Also
> these objects are in states where they cannot be directly used with set
> and
> get from outside. In these situations, i woulld like to write java Beans
> without the getter/setter pair.
>
> When I do such a mapping I get an error message that the setter method is
> not there.
>
> I looked at the graffito-jcr-mapping.dtd to see if there were any flags
> that
> can handle the case without set/get. But I could not find any.
>
> Is there a way to specifiy java class without setter/getter for jcr
> Mapping
> ?
>
> Thanks for the help in advance,
> Raji
>
>
> I have already posted this question in jackrabbit forum. Sorry for posting
> this here again. I was not sure if anybody is checking graffito related
> questions there.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Can-jcr-mapping-be-specified-through-bean-fields-without-set-get-methods---tf3867935.html#a10958356
> Sent from the Graffito - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message